2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey – XIII. The nature of the most luminous obscured AGN in the low-redshift universe

Abstract: We present a multi wavelength analysis of 28 of the most luminous low-redshift narrow-line, ultra-hard X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) drawn from the 70 month Swift/BAT all-sky survey, with bolometric luminosities of log(L bol /erg s −1 ) 45.25. The broad goal of our study is to determine whether these objects have any distinctive properties, potentially setting them aside from lower-luminosity obscured AGN in the local Universe. Our analysis relies on the first data release of the BAT AGN Spectros… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
(323 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as IGR J16058-7253 is concerned, we were able to assess, thanks to NuSTAR observations, that the hard X-ray emission detected by both INTEGRAL/IBIS and Swift/BAT is not coming from just one of the two counterparts, but rather the high energy detections are the contribution of both AGN. This implies that IGR J16058-7253, or rather one of its counterparts LEDA 259433, cannot be considered as an ultra-luminous AGN, as suggested by Bär et al (2019). We were able to estimate spectral parameters for both AGN and, using the black hole mass considered by Bär et al (2019) for LEDA 259433, we also calculated its bolometric and Eddington luminosities, which are well in agreement with the expected values for type 2 AGN, confirming our hypothesis that this source does not belong to the class of ultra-luminous active galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As far as IGR J16058-7253 is concerned, we were able to assess, thanks to NuSTAR observations, that the hard X-ray emission detected by both INTEGRAL/IBIS and Swift/BAT is not coming from just one of the two counterparts, but rather the high energy detections are the contribution of both AGN. This implies that IGR J16058-7253, or rather one of its counterparts LEDA 259433, cannot be considered as an ultra-luminous AGN, as suggested by Bär et al (2019). We were able to estimate spectral parameters for both AGN and, using the black hole mass considered by Bär et al (2019) for LEDA 259433, we also calculated its bolometric and Eddington luminosities, which are well in agreement with the expected values for type 2 AGN, confirming our hypothesis that this source does not belong to the class of ultra-luminous active galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that IGR J16058-7253, or rather one of its counterparts LEDA 259433, cannot be considered as an ultra-luminous AGN, as suggested by Bär et al (2019). We were able to estimate spectral parameters for both AGN and, using the black hole mass considered by Bär et al (2019) for LEDA 259433, we also calculated its bolometric and Eddington luminosities, which are well in agreement with the expected values for type 2 AGN, confirming our hypothesis that this source does not belong to the class of ultra-luminous active galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations