2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basin perspectives on the Water–Energy–Food Security Nexus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the majority of current nexus analyses are water-centred and the nexus literature emphasises the importance of building on existing institutional settings [2], different river basin organisations have been actively engaged in nexus discussions (e.g., [17,22]). While the nexus can help to refocus the RBOs' activities and extend their understanding and even political leverage [25], we nevertheless feel that the nexus as a multisectoral and multilevel process should preferably not have a single owner. Rather, it would be important to implement the nexus through a multi-stakeholder process [127][128][129], where key actors from food and energy sectors also take initiative and ownership of the process.…”
Section: Transboundary Context's Implications For the Nexusmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the majority of current nexus analyses are water-centred and the nexus literature emphasises the importance of building on existing institutional settings [2], different river basin organisations have been actively engaged in nexus discussions (e.g., [17,22]). While the nexus can help to refocus the RBOs' activities and extend their understanding and even political leverage [25], we nevertheless feel that the nexus as a multisectoral and multilevel process should preferably not have a single owner. Rather, it would be important to implement the nexus through a multi-stakeholder process [127][128][129], where key actors from food and energy sectors also take initiative and ownership of the process.…”
Section: Transboundary Context's Implications For the Nexusmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Water 2016, 8,193 2 of 25 international borders [17,[22][23][24][25]. Despite all these publications, the actual added value provided by the nexus approach in different contexts remains partly unclear and also contested.…”
Section: To Transboundary River Basins Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been defined a "security" nexus, as access to all three elements must The ultimate goal for analysing the connections between water, energy and food, and highlighting the potential areas for conflict, trade-offs and synergies, is to guide policy-making towards integrated solutions and approaches to resource use [12,13,[18][19][20]. For example, a EWFN approach can dismantle the logical basis of policies that, in order to ensure food security, heavily subsidize electricity for pumping ground water for irrigation.…”
Section: Definition and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been defined a "security" nexus, as access to all three elements must be ensured in order to have prosperity and peace [18]. Both of these matters further emphasize the importance of achieving this result.…”
Section: Definition and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the production and supply of food and energy are closely interconnected with water availability and quality (Bazilian et al, 2011;Ringler et al, 2013;Lawford et al, 2013;5 Damerau et al, 2016). Climate change may add further constraints to the sustainable use of water resources, by causing increased drought frequency and intensity in vulnerable regions such as the Euro-Mediterranean area (Planton et al, 2012;IPCC, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%