2020
DOI: 10.4236/jdaip.2020.84020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic Tenets of Classification Algorithms K-Nearest-Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Neural Network: A Review

Abstract: In this paper, sixty-eight research articles published between 2000 and 2017 as well as textbooks which employed four classification algorithms: K-Nearest-Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Neural Network (NN) as the main statistical tools were reviewed. The aim was to examine and compare these nonparametric classification methods on the following attributes: robustness to training data, sensitivity to changes, data fitting, stability, ability to handle large data sizes, sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods, such as the support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest regression (RFR), have been widely used to retrieve vegetation parameters [16][17][18][19]. Nevertheless, training an SVM with high-dimensional data can be extremely slow [20], while ANN is prone to overfitting, and the parameter setting in ANN is more complicated [21]. Compared to SVM and ANN, RFR has proven to be a very robust machine learning algorithm for the retrieval of vegetation parameters, including the CCC [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning methods, such as the support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest regression (RFR), have been widely used to retrieve vegetation parameters [16][17][18][19]. Nevertheless, training an SVM with high-dimensional data can be extremely slow [20], while ANN is prone to overfitting, and the parameter setting in ANN is more complicated [21]. Compared to SVM and ANN, RFR has proven to be a very robust machine learning algorithm for the retrieval of vegetation parameters, including the CCC [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the retrieval models established using empirical methods or machine learning mostly use local sampled data for training. Although the empirical retrieval model is accurate for a specific type, a specific area, or a specific time period, its generalization is poor with regard to the time-space change [20]. In recent years, a new hybrid retrieval approach involving vegetation radiative transfer models (RTMs) and machine learning algorithms has been developed to compensate for limited field data [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KNN is a powerful classification [10] algorithm well known for pattern recognition [11]. That is why it is used in this project to classify new objects (donations) based on similarity measurement between donations already shared with beneficiaries and new donations not shared yet.…”
Section: Knn Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, data-driven approaches and artificial intelligent algorithms have been in the area of focus due to their higher efficacy. Random forest (RF), Neural Networks (NNs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Naïve Bayes (NB) are amongst such techniques used for landslide susceptibility mapping (Boateng et al 2020;Chen et al, 2019;Dou et al, 2019;Huang et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%