Basic residential neighborhood infrastructure financing in Nigeria urban cities: Community development associations (CDAs)-based approach

Abstract

The study examined the community-based approach to finance basic public infrastructures in residential neighborhoods. The primary objectives of the study were to determine the condition of public infrastructures, the level of community engagement, the modalities of financing and the prominent influencing factors. The study adopted convenience sampling and questionnaire survey techniques. A total of 120 questionnaires were administered to residents of selected high-income communities (HICs) and low/medium-income communities (L/MICs), out of which 48 (80%) and 52 (86.67%) were retrieved, respectively, and analyzed. The study deployed descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation models and mean weighted score to analyze the data. The study found that the residents were satisfied with the security of the neighborhoods but deplored the state of the public potable water infrastructure in both communities. However, the residents in the HICs enjoy a better condition of road infrastructure compared with L/MICs. The residents in both communities indicated a high level of involvement in the financing of public infrastructures, with major engagement in security and waste disposal/management infrastructures. However, the HICs engaged more in road grading/maintenance, while the provision of community potable water was given as a priority by the L/MICs. The major mode of financing basic communal infrastructures is through membership levy/contribution, and prominent influencing factors are cooperation among members, fundraising and income status. Therefore, while private-sector support funds, such as from the CDAs, help in cushioning the effects of basic infrastructure decay, governments at all levels should provide an enabling environment that will motivate mutual communal relationships through integrated infrastructure policies.

Vulnerable spaces, unequal responses: lessons for transformative climate resilience in Lagos

“…In certain high-income neighborhoods, waste seemed to be less of a factor in flooding, and more on the physical topography and building policies. However, it is important to note that overlaps exist in priority areas of flood management irrespective of the income levels of neighborhoods (Fateye et al, 2021). Aisha, an interview participant (Phone Interview, August 25, 2020), who lives in a high-income neighborhood confirmed this.…”

Filling the gaps in local governance: an analysis of the structure and process of informal community governance in Ibadan, Nigeria

“…In response, some communities in Nigeria have created alternative institutions to meet their basic needs. For example, they organise and manage security and crime prevention (Ojebode et al 2016); are actively involved in the construction and maintenance of roads and basic health and education facilities (Oyalowo 2021); organise potable water (Fateye et al 2021) and waste collection and disposal (Wahab 2012); and provide other infrastructure.…”

“…These issues are not confined to Nigeria. Previous research has found that Africa's governance structures are typically top-down and elitist, with popular interaction and participation undervalued(Muna and Babamaragana 2021;Fateye et al 2021). AndMuna and Babamaragana's (2021) recent empirical findings from both Nigeria and Kenya demonstrate that policy and legal frameworks for actively engaging communities in governance are not backed by actual actions.…”