1983
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-029815-3.50140-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic Principles used in the Selection of Monobeads™ion Exchangers for the Separation of Biopolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For those ion exchanger types which allow rapid separations, optimal starting pH and choice of anion or cation exchanger can be determined using chromatographic titration curves (18).…”
Section: Chromatographic Titration Curves (Retention Maps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those ion exchanger types which allow rapid separations, optimal starting pH and choice of anion or cation exchanger can be determined using chromatographic titration curves (18).…”
Section: Chromatographic Titration Curves (Retention Maps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical considerations outlined above have been applied to planning the purification protocols for creatinine kinase [76], carbonic anhydrase [77], urinary proteins [78], and L-toxin of Clostridium sordellii [16]. The concepts above have also been stressed in a visually impressive way by comparing densitometry of the ETC pattern and ion exchange elution profile at the same pH (urinary proteins [78]).…”
Section: Ion-exchange and Metal-chelate Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein titration curves (in reality, pH/mobility curves) became suddenly popular in the late seventies after an original report by Rosengren et al (), who demonstrated a simple method to force a protein to migrate across a quasi‐stationary pH gradient in such a way as to trace a sigmoidal path resembling a classical potentiometric titration curve. These pH/mobility curves were found to be quite useful in a number of applications: (1) for screening of genetic mutants (Righetti et al, ; Righetti et al, ); (2) for studying macromolecule‐ligand interactions (Krishnamoorthy et al, ; Constans et al, ); (3) for demonstrating macromolecule‐macromolecule interactions (Righetti et al, ; Lostanlen et al, ; Gianazza et al, ); (4) for direct pK determination of simple cations and anions and of uni‐uni‐valent amphoteric molecules (Righetti et al, ; Valentini et al, ); (5) for determining dissociation constants ( K d ) of ligands and proteins and their pH dependence (Ek et al, ; Ek and Righetti, ); (6) for detecting protein and peptide microheterogeneity (Arnaud et al, ; Henner and Sitrin, ; Picard et al, ; Van Den Oetelaar and Hoenders, ); and (7) for choosing optimal pH conditions in ion‐exchange chromatography (Fägerstam et al, ).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the Identity and Structure of Recombinant Proteins determination of simple cations and anions and of uni-uni-valent amphoteric molecules (Righetti et al, 1979;Valentini et al, 1980); (5) for determining dissociation constants (K d ) of ligands and proteins and their pH dependence ; (6) for detecting protein and peptide microheterogeneity (Arnaud et al, 1980;Henner and Sitrin, 1984;Picard et al, 1987;Van Den Oetelaar and Hoenders, 1987); and (7) for choosing optimal pH conditions in ion-exchange chromatography (Fägerstam et al, 1983). The times must have been ripe for such an idea, because at just about the same time, Creighton (1979) reported a method for studying the unfolding of proteins by running them across a urea gradient: these denaturation curves, often sigmoidal in shape, represent the transition from the folded to the unfolded state.…”
Section: 318mentioning
confidence: 99%