2009
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/74941012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology

Abstract: This is the published version of a paper published in Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology.Citation for the original published paper (version of record):Horner, K., Islam, M., Flygare, L., Tsiklakis, K., Whaites, E. (2009) Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology.. Dento

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
1
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
162
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…( 1 , 2 ) Three different aspects have to be considered in the optimization of an X‐ray imaging modality: quantification of the radiation dose and risk for patients, assessment of technical image quality, and assessment of diagnostic image quality. By means of an appropriate test object, the first and second aspect can be studied in one investigation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1 , 2 ) Three different aspects have to be considered in the optimization of an X‐ray imaging modality: quantification of the radiation dose and risk for patients, assessment of technical image quality, and assessment of diagnostic image quality. By means of an appropriate test object, the first and second aspect can be studied in one investigation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dental practitioners should prescribe CBCT imaging only when they expect that the diagnostic yield will benefit patient care, enhance patient safety or improve clinical outcomes significantly. [64,78,86] …”
Section: Cross Sectional Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 It is far better to take into account the quality and quantity of the local bone and other specifics such as: the cortical thickness, the marrow spaces within, Hounsfield Units, the density of the spongy bone, the large trabecular radiolucencies etc. All of these factors can influence the primary stability and success rates of an implant and can be deduced pre-operatively, rather than labelling it into a specific class of bone post-operatively.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance the Need To Train Clinical Microbiomentioning
confidence: 99%