Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
SummaryBackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic represented a significant source of anxiety and stress for equine veterinarians and clients, with the potential for measurable effects on caseload and owner economics.ObjectiveTo compare the number of horses presenting for emergency colic evaluation and treatment, as well as costs at two equine referral hospitals.Study designRetrospective cohort.MethodsMedical records of horses admitted to North Carolina State University (NCSU) and Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic (BEVC) were compared. Total equine accessions, number of horses referred for colic and patient age were recorded over an 11‐year period (2013–2023). Horses were categorised based on treatment as medical, surgical treatment with recovery, surgical exploration with intraoperative euthanasia, or euthanasia without surgery. Total invoice of each case was also recorded.ResultsTotal equine accessions, total number and proportion of horses presenting for evaluation of colic, and number of horses recovering from colic surgery at NCSU increased following onset of the pandemic, while they remained similar to pre‐pandemic levels at BEVC. The proportion of horses presenting for colic that received surgery decreased at both hospitals over the study period. Mean invoice totals for horses surviving colic surgery increased at both hospitals over the study period, but was not significantly associated with euthanasia. Age was not significantly different between categories of colic.Main limitationsRetrospective study design, differences in academic and private practices.ConclusionsThe decreasing proportion of horses admitted for colic that received surgery is likely due to the increased caseload of first‐opinion care at referral practices during the pandemic, as fewer options were available to owners. The increasing number of horses euthanised intraoperatively or euthanised without receiving surgery may be due to the dramatically rising costs of medical care, particularly surgery.
SummaryBackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic represented a significant source of anxiety and stress for equine veterinarians and clients, with the potential for measurable effects on caseload and owner economics.ObjectiveTo compare the number of horses presenting for emergency colic evaluation and treatment, as well as costs at two equine referral hospitals.Study designRetrospective cohort.MethodsMedical records of horses admitted to North Carolina State University (NCSU) and Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic (BEVC) were compared. Total equine accessions, number of horses referred for colic and patient age were recorded over an 11‐year period (2013–2023). Horses were categorised based on treatment as medical, surgical treatment with recovery, surgical exploration with intraoperative euthanasia, or euthanasia without surgery. Total invoice of each case was also recorded.ResultsTotal equine accessions, total number and proportion of horses presenting for evaluation of colic, and number of horses recovering from colic surgery at NCSU increased following onset of the pandemic, while they remained similar to pre‐pandemic levels at BEVC. The proportion of horses presenting for colic that received surgery decreased at both hospitals over the study period. Mean invoice totals for horses surviving colic surgery increased at both hospitals over the study period, but was not significantly associated with euthanasia. Age was not significantly different between categories of colic.Main limitationsRetrospective study design, differences in academic and private practices.ConclusionsThe decreasing proportion of horses admitted for colic that received surgery is likely due to the increased caseload of first‐opinion care at referral practices during the pandemic, as fewer options were available to owners. The increasing number of horses euthanised intraoperatively or euthanised without receiving surgery may be due to the dramatically rising costs of medical care, particularly surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.