2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/054004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic network structure of SiO2–B2O3–Na2O glasses from diffraction and reverse Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract: Neutron-and high-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments have been performed on the (75-x)SiO2-xB2O3-25Na2O x=5, 10, 15 and 20 mol% glasses. The structure factor has been measured over a broad momentum transfer range, between 0.4-22 Å -1 . For data analyses and modeling the Fourier transformation and the RMC simulation techniques have been applied. The partial atomic pair correlation functions, the nearest neighbour distances, coordination number distributions and average coordination number values an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The B-O coordination was in the range of 3.48 ± 0.05 to 4.00 ± 0.05, and obtained the changes in BO3/BO4 ratio. The boron atoms were coordinated mostly by three and four oxygen atoms, forming trigonal BO3 and tetrahedral BO4 units, in agreement with coordination numbers in SiO2-Na2O-B2O3 glasses [39], in MoO3-ZnO-B2O3 glasses [40], and in ZnO-B2O3-Li2O-Al2O3 glasses [41]. The nearest W-O distances showed characteristic peaks at 1.75 ± 0.05 (Table 3) for both series.…”
Section: Epr Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The B-O coordination was in the range of 3.48 ± 0.05 to 4.00 ± 0.05, and obtained the changes in BO3/BO4 ratio. The boron atoms were coordinated mostly by three and four oxygen atoms, forming trigonal BO3 and tetrahedral BO4 units, in agreement with coordination numbers in SiO2-Na2O-B2O3 glasses [39], in MoO3-ZnO-B2O3 glasses [40], and in ZnO-B2O3-Li2O-Al2O3 glasses [41]. The nearest W-O distances showed characteristic peaks at 1.75 ± 0.05 (Table 3) for both series.…”
Section: Epr Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the present work, the experimentally measured X-ray structure factors (S(Q)) for bismuth tellurite and niobium bismuth tellurite glasses were simulated using the RMC++ soware and partial atomic pair correlation functions, co-ordination numbers, and distribution of bond-lengths and bond angles were determined. 26,[36][37][38][39] RMC uses a threedimensional atomic conguration to t the experimental S(Q) data with the calculated S(Q) and tends to minimize the squared difference between the two S(Q) by the random movement of the atoms in the simulation box. 32,40 As a starting model for each RMC simulation, a random atomic conguration with a simulation box containing a total of 10 000 atoms of Bi, Te, and O for bismuth tellurite system, and 10 000 atoms of Bi, Nb, Te, and O for niobium bismuth tellurite glass system was built using the density data given in Table 1.…”
Section: Reverse Monte Carlo (Rmc) Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction data of glasses was analyzed by Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) simulations, the latter is a powerful tool to study the short-range structural properties such as bond-lengths, bond-angles and the average coordination numbers in disordered materials. 26 The use of high energy X-rays and large area detectors provides access to high values of momentum transfer function, Q with the additional advantage of smaller polarization corrections due to smaller diffraction angles (maximum used 2q $40 ). 27 The diffraction data of the anti-glass sample: 20Bi 2 O 3 -80TeO 2 (Bi 2 Te 4 O 11 ) was analyzed by Rietveld renement in order to obtain the detailed crystal structure information including the Te and Bi co-ordination numbers, the cationoxygen bond lengths and the unit cell parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) The experimental neutron structure factor S(Q) data was obtained and simulated by the RMC method using RMC ++ Version 1. (40,47) The RMC technique minimises the squared difference between the experimental S(Q) and the simulated one from a three-dimensional atomic configuration and partial correlation functions g ij (r) and the neutron scattering weight factors for different correlations were calculated by the following formulas: (48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53) ij ij , ( ) ( )…”
Section: Rmc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%