Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Review

Esmaili, Mohammad Reza Amir; Damari, Behzad; Hajebi, Ahmad; Rafiee, Noora; Goudarzi, Reza; Haghshenas, Abbas

doi:10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6103

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 50 publications

(46 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some authors have provided general models for ISC. One of these models is the Bergen Model of Collaborative Functioning (BMCF), which was developed to produce synergy from collaborative health promotion ( 20 , 73 – 75 ). Diagnosis of Sustainable Collaboration (DISC) is another model that is used for health promotion ( 76 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review

Najafi,

Mosadeghrad,

Arab

2023

ijph

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The implementation of health interventions requires the collaboration of various sectors outside health due to the multidimensional nature of healthcare. Building effective partnerships demands the use of intersectoral mechanisms that facilitate the leadership and implementation of these programs. In this review, the mechanisms of intersectoral collaboration (ISC) and their results were identified. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in 2020. Using relevant keywords, all documents related to ISC in the health system were identified by searching four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science), Google, and Google scholar search engines. In the initial search, 2911 documents were extracted. Based on the selection criteria 52 documents were selected for content analysis. Results: Five areas of ISC were identified, including funding (collection, pooling, and distribution of funds), governance and leadership (political commitment, rules and regulations, control and evaluation, and stakeholder engagement), structural mechanisms (interorganizational, government-based, and program-based structures), process tools (information tools, support tools, and resource and service sharing), and models and frameworks (general, national, and program-specific models). Conclusion: An intersectoral framework or model be developed that considers the financial, structural, and leadership aspects as well as the necessary process tools required for each program. Moreover, it should be considered communication and human resources empowerment in each intervention.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review

Najafi,

Mosadeghrad,

Arab

2023

ijph

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A review of the international literature carried out in 2018 by Corbin (25) responded to the objective of identifying alliance processes on health promotion, finding 26 studies carried out between 2007 and 2015, a period of 8 years, mostly from the United States, and none on LAC. Another similar review about health promotion was developed by Reza (26) in 2021 to map the existing literature between 2001 and 2015 about intersectorality and the HIAP approach and finding 52 articles in the review according to the established inclusion criteria; most studies come from the United States, again, and to a smaller extent, from Germany, Canada, and Australia. Among the LAC countries, only Brazil is found, with only one study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health in All Policies and intersectorality in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2011 - 2021: a scoping review

Escobar Díaz,

Rodriguez Corredor

2023

Rev. Salud Pública (Córdoba)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Intersectoriality, since the Alma Ata Conference in 1978, has become a fundamental part of the political discourse on public health, social determinants, and health promotion to address health problems in society. Following the above, it is important to identify the research carried out in Latin America and the Caribbean on this topic in the last decade. Metodology: A scoping review was carried out on the scientific evidence published between 2011 and 2021 in countries of the Latin American region on experiences and intersectoral actions between health and other sectors to address joint public health problems. Results: 15 studies were included; mostly from Brazil, with predominantly qualitative designs and local character. In addition, some analyses highlight the hegemony of the biomedical model, as well as the conflicts and tensions at the ideological level in certain health issues and traditional practices that limit effective intersectoral collaboration. Conclusions: Intersectoriality is not a strictly technical issue, but ideological elements converge that determine its scope and limitations. Studies in countries such as Colombia should be expanded to have evidence that allows an understanding of the barriers and facilitating aspects of intersectorality.

show abstract

“…According to [3][36], collaboration comes from many levels: • Coexistence: IS don't know each other • Networking: each IS is aware of the existence of other spaces • Cooperation: each one has identified common interests and occasionally carries out operations together • Partnership: they occasionally carry out projects together in sharing roles, skills and risks to achieve a common goal and communicating regularly • Coordination: IS have similar operations and strategies [49][36] The first level is important. Indeed, it's necessary that the IS is extremely well defined [11] and knows its individual characteristics (innovation process, strategic intent, organization…) [1] before joining a network [50].…”

Section: B) Levels and Governance Of Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…c) Performance Indicators Through our study, a literature review examining model, criteria and indicators of collaboration was identified [49]. After the analysis of the different existing network representations show in [49], we could see that the temporal and dynamic dimension of the network is rarely taken into account in these representations [28]. It will be necessary to include them for monitoring and evaluation.…”

Section: B) Levels and Governance Of Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Networks between Innovation Spaces

Pruvot

Dupont

Morel

2022

2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) &Amp; 31st International Associati

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase of the innovation spaces number on a territory makes them unstable and fragile. Indeed, several studies have shown that most of them are following the same "Death Valley" due to a dispersion of both the financial and human resources. This is why the hypothesis that creating collaborative networks considered as an inter-organizational alliance would make these places sustainable, was taken. Combining their variety of actors and competencies and their complementarity in materials and equipment's would allow producing greater innovations and impacts on a territory aligned with the major transitions we have to face today.Based on a review of the scientific literature, the trends about innovation spaces were identified and the start point of a collaborative framework was established. This start point correspond to four findings. The first one is the generic dimensions to characterize and evaluate the network performance. The second one is the five levels of collaboration and the six types of governance. The third is the identification of some key performance indicators to characterize a collaborative dynamic. The last one is the identification of emerging dynamic of collaboration between innovation spaces.

show abstract

Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Review

Cited by 7 publications

References 50 publications

Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review

Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review

Health in All Policies and intersectorality in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2011 - 2021: a scoping review

Collaborative Networks between Innovation Spaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About