La Cueva De Caldas (Priorio, Oviedo).
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvqht8p.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bases De Subsistencia De Origen Animal Durante El Magdaleniense en La Cueva De Las Caldas (Priorio, Oviedo)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bizkaia, the Gravettian Level VI of Bolinkoba provided a contemporaneous date for this regional period, while a second one is much younger (~10k uncal BP), attributable to the regional Azilian, suggesting significant mixing or curational problem as no diagnostic Azilian lithic material has been recovered or identified in Level VI assemblage [ 53 ]. In Amalda (Gipuzkoa), three dates provided younger dates than expected [ 54 ]. One sample from Mousterian Level VII provided a date within a Gravettian time range (~28k uncal BP), possibly reflecting a limited admixture between Levels VI and VII [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Bizkaia, the Gravettian Level VI of Bolinkoba provided a contemporaneous date for this regional period, while a second one is much younger (~10k uncal BP), attributable to the regional Azilian, suggesting significant mixing or curational problem as no diagnostic Azilian lithic material has been recovered or identified in Level VI assemblage [ 53 ]. In Amalda (Gipuzkoa), three dates provided younger dates than expected [ 54 ]. One sample from Mousterian Level VII provided a date within a Gravettian time range (~28k uncal BP), possibly reflecting a limited admixture between Levels VI and VII [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mousterian levels dated were Amalda VII [ 14 ], Axlor IV [ 15 ] and Llonín VI [ 16 – 20 ], while the only Châtelperronian level was Ekain Xa [ 21 ]. The Aurignacian levels were Aitzbitarte (Cave III-entrance area) Vb center [ 22 ], Ekain IXb, Cobrante V and VI [ 23 ], El Ruso Cave I IVb [ 24 ], El Otero IV, V and VI [ 25 ], Morin 7c [ 26 ], Covalejos B (2) and C (3) [ 27 ]. Finally, the Gravettian levels were Aitzbitarte (Cave III-entrance area) IV, Va and Vb upper, Amalda V and VI, Bolinkoba VI/F [ 28 – 29 ], El Cuco III and Vb [ 30 – 31 ], La Viña VII, VIII, IX and X [ 32 – 36 ] and Llonín V. Other regional sites with contemporaneous cultural attributions, but unclear stratigraphy, insufficient archaeological information, or those that are currently still under study were not included here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, no portable art has yet been identified in the Gravettian units, contrasting with the Noaillian from Isturitz [ 15 ]. The faunal assemblages dominated in the entrance sector by bovids ( Bos/Bison ), red deer and chamois, and by Bos/Bison in the interior [ 35 , 36 ]. In these assemblages, the presence of consumed birds, fish and molluscs has also been attested [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gracile, light-weight points were possibly hafted onto throwing spears. But there are clearly long and short Gravettes; both regular and microgravettes are recognized in the de Sonneville-Bordes/Perrot typology and Altuna and Merino 1984;Altuna et al 1985Altuna et al , 1990Barandianin et al 1985;Corch6n 1981;Gonzklez Echegaray and Barandiara"n 1981;Gonzilez Echegaray and Freeman 1971;Moure and Cano 1976;Straus 1988;Straus and Clark 1986;Utrilla 1982. are described by Bricker and David (1984) at the Abri Pataud, where there is evidence of decreasing size for both types through time (see also Harrold, this volume). There are also some bone, antler, and ivory points in the Gravettian.…”
Section: Of Arms and Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%