2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline susceptibility to chlorantraniliprole of Brazilian populations of Plutella xylostella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar data has also been collected for susceptible field strains from Brazil (Ribeiro et al, 2014, da Silva et al, 2012) and Japan (Steinbach et al, 2015). …”
Section: Baseline Susceptibility Monitoring For Diamide Insecticidessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Similar data has also been collected for susceptible field strains from Brazil (Ribeiro et al, 2014, da Silva et al, 2012) and Japan (Steinbach et al, 2015). …”
Section: Baseline Susceptibility Monitoring For Diamide Insecticidessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The detection of regional differences in susceptibility to an insecticide before its widespread use in the field has been reported for metaflumizone, spinosad and chlorantraniliprole . Susceptibility variation in field populations of four insect species to cyantraniliprole has been reported recently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the susceptibility has to be established early to follow these changes, particularly to the new diamide class of insecticides which are very efficient towards T. absoluta . When diamides were released in Brazil to control T. absoluta , the attention was directed to developing a baseline study with populations to establish a diagnostic concentration for monitoring the resistance . Therefore, provisional diagnostic concentrations of 1 mg AI L −1 and 3 mg AI L −1 of anthranilic and phthalic diamides, respectively, are suggested for making early decisions to change modes of action when necessary (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%