2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13355-018-0598-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline susceptibility and assessment of resistance risk to flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole in Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) populations from Kuwait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the variation was less than three-fold for flubendiamide and seven-fold for chlorantraniliprole resulting in no differences among the populations for the two insecticides. Similar variations in response to flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole have also been reported in Tuta absoluta populations from Kuwait three-fold and four-fold difference for flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole also showed high homogeneity of response among the populations and increase the resistance after 34 generations of selection with 750 and 860 fold (Jallow et al, 2018). Similarly resistance was also detected in Italian population with 2414 and 1742 fold for chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide (Roditakis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Diamidessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude of the variation was less than three-fold for flubendiamide and seven-fold for chlorantraniliprole resulting in no differences among the populations for the two insecticides. Similar variations in response to flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole have also been reported in Tuta absoluta populations from Kuwait three-fold and four-fold difference for flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole also showed high homogeneity of response among the populations and increase the resistance after 34 generations of selection with 750 and 860 fold (Jallow et al, 2018). Similarly resistance was also detected in Italian population with 2414 and 1742 fold for chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide (Roditakis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Diamidessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Solid set of baseline data has been detected that can be used for the comparisons in the future. High variability in slopes were observed for spinosad (7.2) in Turkey populations (Dagli et al 2012), Chlorantraniliprole (3.79) for Spain populations , flubendiamide (4.93) for Kuwait populations (Jallow et al, 2018) and indoxacarb (4.79) for Spain populations (R od itak is e t al ., 20 1 2). Th ese h igh slo p es o f concentration -mortality curves probably reflect a higher homogeneity of response to these insecticides in these populations (Finney, 1971).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xylostella ( h 2 = 0.26), M. domestica ( h 2 = 0.32), Tuta absoluta ( h 2 = 0.29), S. exigua ( h 2 = 0.11), and Choristoneura rosaceana ( h 2 = 0.17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, variable resistance levels to abamectin, cartap, and permethrin were also reported from five different regions of Brazil due to long periods with a high frequency of usage of the chemicals against P. absoluta (Siqueira et al ., 2000). The resistance of P. absoluta to flubendiamide (750-fold) and cyantraniliprole (860-fold) in Kuwait was due to differential selection pressures in glasshouse conditions and application of different amount of insecticide in the field (Jallow et al ., 2019). In European/Asian regions, low to moderate resistance to emamectin benzoate (15-fold), spinosad (RR: 33-fold), indoxacarb (RR: 13–91-fold), and chlorantraniliprole (RR: 64-fold) was due to target site mutation at glutamate-gated chloride channel, the gamma amino butyric acid gene fragments (Roditakis et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%