2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline neutrophilia, derived neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and outcome in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with Nivolumab or Docetaxel

Abstract: Nivolumab is a novel therapeutic option in NSCLC, associated with a significant survival gain compared with Docetaxel. However, predictive biomarkers are lacking. The presence of systemic inflammation has been correlated with poor outcome in many cancer types. We aimed to evaluate whether there is a correlation between some indicators of inflammation and response to Nivolumab or Docetaxel in pre-treated NSCLCs. Data of 62 patients receiving Nivolumab or Docetaxel were analyzed. Baseline neutrophilia and thromb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a combined leukocyte-CEA score revealed that classified patients into three risk groups showed strong correlation with clinical outcome. Our data are in line to previous reports indicating an unfavorable role of peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia in the context of inflammation in different malignancies, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]21 including rectal cancer. 22,23 With regard to NLR, a pooled analysis of retrospective studies indicated a negative predictive impact in rectal cancer.…”
Section: <0001supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Also, a combined leukocyte-CEA score revealed that classified patients into three risk groups showed strong correlation with clinical outcome. Our data are in line to previous reports indicating an unfavorable role of peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia in the context of inflammation in different malignancies, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]21 including rectal cancer. 22,23 With regard to NLR, a pooled analysis of retrospective studies indicated a negative predictive impact in rectal cancer.…”
Section: <0001supporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, there was no significant difference between the LIPI 0 and 1 groups, despite the fact that the LIPI 1 group included a greater proportion of poor PS patients than the LIPI 0 group did ( P = 0.001). Russo et al . reported that in patients who received nivolumab or docetaxel, the PFS of the higher dNLR group was not significantly different from that of the lower dNLR group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, patients with dNLR greater than 3 and LDH higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN) are defined as “Poor (LIPI 2)”, patients with dNLR greater than 3 and LDH lower than ULN or dNLR less than 3 and LDH higher than ULN are defined as “Intermediate (LIPI 1)”, and patients with dNLR less than 3 and LDH lower than ULN are defined as “Good (LIPI 0)” . dNLR and LDH have previously been shown to be useful prognostic factors in many studies . Thus, LIPI with a clear cutoff value is expected to be a useful marker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following information was extracted from each study: first author's name, publication year, country of origin, number of patients, therapeutic regimen, cancer type, and clinical factors. HRs and 95% CIs were used to combine these data, they were obtained directly from 13 articles when described in text or tables, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] or calculated from available numerical data using methods reported by Tierney et al, [28][29][30] or by emailing the authors. 31 Multivariate data were preferable to univariate data if both were provided; however, univariate data were acceptable if multivariate results were not presented.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suh et al 31 Diem et al 16 Khoja et al 20 Russo et al 24 Overall (I-squared = 80.2%, P = 0.002) 0.0885 1 11.3 NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis Figure 4 Forest plot of the hazard ratio (HR) of the impact of pretreatment platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of PLR on (a) PFS and (b) OS.…”
Section: Weight (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%