2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13617-021-00102-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline monitoring of volcanic regions with little recent activity: application of Sentinel-1 InSAR to Turkish volcanoes

Abstract: Volcanoes have dormancy periods that may last decades to centuries meaning that eruptions at volcanoes with no historical records of eruptions are common. Baseline monitoring to detect the early stages of reawakening is therefore important even in regions with little recent volcanic activity. Satellite techniques, such as InSAR, are ideally suited for routinely surveying large and inaccessible regions, but the large datasets typically require expert interpretation. Here we focus on Turkey where there are 10 Ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We determine mass and volume changes upon reservoir recharge for given source pressurisation (ΔP) and source density change (Δρ) at the detectability limits of joint gravimetric and geodetic field surveys. We set the limits to 0.01 m for vertical surface displacements and 0 ± 5 μGal (1μ 10 -8 m s −2 ) for residual gravity changes based on the typical sensitivity of field instrumentation and survey protocols as well as constraints from remote sensing of volcanoes in the CAVP (Biggs et al, 2021). The minimum detectable volume flux into the reservoir is given by McTigue (1987):…”
Section: Mass and Volume Fluxes At The Detectability Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We determine mass and volume changes upon reservoir recharge for given source pressurisation (ΔP) and source density change (Δρ) at the detectability limits of joint gravimetric and geodetic field surveys. We set the limits to 0.01 m for vertical surface displacements and 0 ± 5 μGal (1μ 10 -8 m s −2 ) for residual gravity changes based on the typical sensitivity of field instrumentation and survey protocols as well as constraints from remote sensing of volcanoes in the CAVP (Biggs et al, 2021). The minimum detectable volume flux into the reservoir is given by McTigue (1987):…”
Section: Mass and Volume Fluxes At The Detectability Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings relate to the significant source volume increase of 2-5 × 10 -3 km 3 upon magma recharge at Erciyes Dağ without observable surface displacement or residual gravity variations. Under the reasonable assumption that magma reservoir replenishment at Erciyes Dağ occurs below the detection limit of surface uplift velocities of 0.01 m yr −1 (Biggs et al, 2021), the reservoir may currently sustain eruptable magma if deduced mass changes are taken as annual fluxes. This "stealth" magma flow into the reservoir matches and exceeds reported magma fluxes at several intermediate and silicic stratovolcanoes with repose times of 100-1000s of years (e.g., Parinacota, Soufrière Hills volcano and Mt.…”
Section: Magma Reservoir Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact quantification of the current state of pressurisation of Hasan Dağ's magma reservoir is beyond the scope of this study and possible variations in reservoir pressure due to magma influx and rejuvenation or volatile loss are hence neglected. Although InSAR data from the European Space Agency Sentinel-1 mission between 2014 and 2020 show annual ground displacement velocities at Hasan Dağ below the detectabilty limit of 1 cm yr −1 (Biggs et al, 2021), the volcano's high prominence and crustal mechanics of the CAVP could contribute to significant volumes of stealth magma accumulation at depth (Males and Gottsmann, 2021) at the geodetic detectability limit.…”
Section: Coulomb Failure Stress Change On Hasan Dağ's Magma Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The aim is to provide users with tools that support interrogation of the data, with a particular focus on distinguishing between atmospheric features and volcanic deformation (e.g. Pinel et al, 2011;Ebmeier et al, 2018;Biggs et al, 2021). We present new Sentinel-1 InSAR results in the context of historical observations of volcano deformation (as described in Ebmeier et al, (2018)) organised according to volcano numbers from the Smithsonian list of Holocene volcanoes 240 (Global Volcanism Program., 2022).…”
Section: Automated Processing and Small Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%