2006
DOI: 10.21314/jcr.2006.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basel requirements of downturn loss given default: modeling and estimating probability of default and loss given default correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…), one simply needs a model for default τ and need not concern themselves with modeling recovery in the event of default. In this paper, we explicitly model recovery and remove the constant recovery assumption in CDS pricing thereby valuing the protection leg of the CDS using (5) directly rather than (6).…”
Section: B Tt = Nd(t T) P T [τ > T] + F E T [D(t τ)A τ 1 {τ≤T} ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…), one simply needs a model for default τ and need not concern themselves with modeling recovery in the event of default. In this paper, we explicitly model recovery and remove the constant recovery assumption in CDS pricing thereby valuing the protection leg of the CDS using (5) directly rather than (6).…”
Section: B Tt = Nd(t T) P T [τ > T] + F E T [D(t τ)A τ 1 {τ≤T} ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Giese [3] incorporates PG-LGD correlations into a single-factor Vasicek framework and finds that capital increases by up to 35% at the 99.9% confidence interval for high-yield credit portfolios. While investigating stressed LGDs, Miu and Ozdemir [6] find that in order to compensate for neglecting the PD-LGD correlation in credit capital modeling, the mean LGD must be increased by about 37% from its unbiased estimate in order to compensate for the lack of correlations.…”
Section: Modeling Recovery Risk Within a Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations