Base‐Promoted Isomerizations of Epoxides

Abstract

Epoxides have long enjoyed popularity as synthetic intermediates because of their facile preparation, often with substantial stereochemical control, and their high chemical reactivity, a feature attributable to the ring strain of these small‐ring heterocycles. The preponderance of synthetic applications involves nucleophilic opening of the epoxide ring, and an enormous range of nucleophilic species has been utilized for this purpose. The conversion of epoxides to isomeric compounds under the influence of acidic reagents has also been used preparatively for some time. However, it is only relatively recently that such isomerizations have been effected by strong, non‐nucleophilic base such as lithium dialkylamides (LiNR 2 ). This chapter is concerned with the synthetic potential of these base‐promoted reactions of epoxides. Although several types of isomeric products are observed on treatment of epoxides with strong bases, the most interesting conversion from a synthetic point of view is the formation of allylic alcohols. This subject constitutes the major emphasis of this discussion. A second, much less common transformation is typified by the conversion of cis ‐cyclooctene oxide to endo ‐2‐bicyclo[3.3.0]octanol, along with some of the expected allylic alcohol. This early observation attracted considerable attention because of the unanticipated generation of a new carbon skeleton in the isomerization process and is largely responsible for the subsequent flurry of activity in the area of base isomerizations of epoxides. A third type of conversion also occasionally observed leads to the production of an isomeric carbonyl compound. The final isomerization pathway included in this survey involves the transformation of epoxides possessing allylic, propargylic, or benzylic methylene groups with a 1,3 relationship to an epoxide carbon into cyclopropylcarbinols by lithium amides in the presence of hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA). This review attempts to provide the necessary information for predicting the type of isomerization to be expected for a given epoxide under a specified set of conditions and, where possible, for manipulating these conditions to achieve the desired conversions. The survey is limited to the isomerizations of simple epoxides by powerful, relatively non‐nucleophilic bases. Thus the significant literature concerning epoxides with proximate carbonyl functions and other anion‐stabilizing substituents is not considered since the chemistry of such molecules is typical of the stabilized anions (intramolecular alkylations, Favorskii rearrangements, etc. ) with the epoxide unit serving the trivial function of a good leaving group. In addition to lithium amides and organolithium reagents, the recently developed dialkylaluminum amides are systematically covered. Studies utilizing non‐nucleophilic alkoxides ( e.g. , potassium tert ‐butoxide), particularly in polar aprotic solvents, are also included. However, the vast literature concerning the interaction of epoxides with metal alkoxides in alcohol solvents is not reviewed since these conditions are generally conducive to nucleophilic addition and are only rarely effective in promoting the epoxide isomerizations of concern in this chapter.

Structural Elucidation of tmeda‐Solvated Alkali Metal Diphenylamide Complexes

“…[1][2][3][4][5] In particular, the metal salts of diisopropylamine [da(H)], 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane [hmds(H)] and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine [tmp(H)] are widely utilised across synthetic laboratories primarily because of the desirable combination of high Brønsted basicity and low nucleophilicity. Of particular interest in this study, another amido reagent, the thermally highly stable lithium diphenylamide (LiNPh 2 ), has shown promise in a range of synthetic transformations.…”

Rearrangement of Epoxides to Allylic Alcohols in the Presence of Reusable Basic Resins

“…The rearrangement of epoxides to produce allylic alcohols is one such application [5]. It is known to occur via both α-and β-deprotonation processes [6], the latter of which 2 involves a simple β-elimination reaction and is generally preferred (Scheme 1).…”

E- and Z-Stereoselectivity in the preparation of enamides from glycidyl sulfonamides and carbamates

“…TS-B) between the epoxide methylene and the sulfonamide unit. 1c-e (entries [3][4][5] illustrates that formation of the Z-isomer is proportional to the steric bulk of the carbamate N-substituent. That the effect is steric, and not electronic, in origin was confirmed by comparing phenyl case 1d with that of the p-methoxy analogue 1f; exactly the same E : Z ratio was obtained in each case (entries 4 and 6).…”

“…4 In relation to this and based on our ongoing drug discovery programmes, we wished to prepare a range of enamines of general structure 2, possessing different pendant nitrogen groups. We envisaged that a base-induced epoxide-allylic alcohol rearrangement 5 of the appropriately N-functionalised glycidyl amine 1 would represent an extremely concise entry into this series of compounds from simple starting materials (Scheme 1). Excepting a single example, 6 there have been no reports on this particular reaction variant with acyclic substrates.…”