2019
DOI: 10.1111/acel.13062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Base excision repair but not DNA double‐strand break repair is impaired in aged human adipose‐derived stem cells

Abstract: The decline in DNA repair capacity contributes to the age-associated decrease in genome integrity in somatic cells of different species. However, due to the lack of clinical samples and appropriate tools for studying DNA repair, whether and how age-associated changes in DNA repair result in a loss of genome integrity of human adult stem cells remains incompletely characterized. Here, we isolated 20 eyelid adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) lines from healthy individuals (young: 10 donors with ages ranging 17-25 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, both ASCs shifted from similarly low levels of foci γ-H2AX expression at initial passages to most of the cells pan-expressing it at P12 and progressively thereafter. The γ-H2AX shift from foci to pan expression over passages is a strong indicator of response pathways' activation to persistent DNA damage that ultimately induces cell senescence [46,47]. Interestingly, despite the disparity in cell donors chronological age, no major differences were observed between their genetic stability in vitro, as initially expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In our study, both ASCs shifted from similarly low levels of foci γ-H2AX expression at initial passages to most of the cells pan-expressing it at P12 and progressively thereafter. The γ-H2AX shift from foci to pan expression over passages is a strong indicator of response pathways' activation to persistent DNA damage that ultimately induces cell senescence [46,47]. Interestingly, despite the disparity in cell donors chronological age, no major differences were observed between their genetic stability in vitro, as initially expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…According to the DNA damage theory of aging (Gensler and Bernstein, 1981), DNA lesions are recognized as the primary cause of aging. Supporting this idea, increased DNA damage in senescent cells, progeria cells, and aged individuals have been reported by a great number of studies (d'Adda di Fagagna et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2005;Sedelnikova et al, 2008;Sedelnikova et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2020b), making DNA damage a universal biomarker of aging. The frequency of γH2AX foci, a well-known biomarker of double-strand breaks, is upregulated in senescent mouse embryonic fibroblasts and multiple organs, including liver, lung, dermis, crypt of the small intestine, and spleen lymphocytes, in aged mice (Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Dna Damage and Repairmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Impaired DNA repair is one of the causes of DNA damage accumulation in aged cells, evidenced by reduced expression (Chen et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020b;Ju et al, 2006;Redwood et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2020b) or delayed recruitment kinetics of DNA repair factors (Liu et al, 2005;Redwood et al, 2011;Sedelnikova et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2020b) and a decline in repair fidelity (Li et al, 2016b;Vaidya et al, 2014). Normally, γH2AX foci are cleared upon completion of the repair process.…”
Section: Dna Damage and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that MDL‐800 promotes genomic stability by boosting DNA repair. Considering SIRT6 participates in repairing both DSBs and DNA damage at bases, we set out to investigate which pathway could be activated post‐MDL‐800 treatment using our previously reported extrachromosomal repair assay (Seluanov, Mao, & Gorbunova, 2010; Zhang et al, 2020). The GFP‐based NHEJ or HR cassettes were linearized by I‐SceI endonuclease in vitro to mimic DSBs.…”
Section: Introduction Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, SIRT6 was reported to regulate BER in both mice and humans (Mostoslavsky et al, 2006; Xu et al, 2015). We then investigated whether MDL‐800 treatment also influences the BER pathway using our previously established plasmid reactivation assay (Xu et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2020). Briefly, 10 μg pEGFP‐N1 plasmid was mixed with methylene blue, followed by a 120‐min exposure to visible light generated by a 100‐W bulb, which induces 8‐hydroxyguanine damage on plasmids.…”
Section: Introduction Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%