2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.19.464826
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Base editors for citrus gene editing

Abstract: Base editors, such as adenine base editors (ABE) and cytosine base editors (CBE), provide alternatives for precise genome editing without generating double-strand breaks (DSBs), thus avoiding the risk of genome instability and unpredictable outcomes caused by DNA repair. Precise gene editing mediated by base editors in citrus has not been reported. Here, we have successfully adapted the ABE to modify the TATA box in the promoter region of the canker susceptibility gene LOB1 from TATA to CACA in grapefruit and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRISPR/Cas mediated genome editing is deemed the most promising approach to breed new citrus cultivars, owing to its short time requirement, precise genetic improvement and predictable results (Chen et al, 2019;Gao, 2021;Cao et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022a). To date, SpCas9/gRNA from Streptococcus pyogenes, SaCas9/gRNA from Staphylococcus aureus, LbCas12a/crRNA from Lachnospiraceae bacterium and base editor derived from SpCas9/gRNA have been successfully adapted to modify citrus genomes for gene function study and new citrus cultivar breeding (Jia and Wang, 2014a;Jia et al, 2016;Peng et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Jia et al, 2017a, Jia et al, 2017bLeBlanc et al, 2018;Zhu et al, 2019;Jia et al, 2019a;Dutt et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2020;Jia and Wang, 2020;Huang and Wang, 2021;Jia et al, 2021;Alquezar et al, 2022;Jia et al, 2022;Mahmoud et al, 2022;Parajuli et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022bHuang et al, , 2023Su et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CRISPR/Cas mediated genome editing is deemed the most promising approach to breed new citrus cultivars, owing to its short time requirement, precise genetic improvement and predictable results (Chen et al, 2019;Gao, 2021;Cao et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022a). To date, SpCas9/gRNA from Streptococcus pyogenes, SaCas9/gRNA from Staphylococcus aureus, LbCas12a/crRNA from Lachnospiraceae bacterium and base editor derived from SpCas9/gRNA have been successfully adapted to modify citrus genomes for gene function study and new citrus cultivar breeding (Jia and Wang, 2014a;Jia et al, 2016;Peng et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Jia et al, 2017a, Jia et al, 2017bLeBlanc et al, 2018;Zhu et al, 2019;Jia et al, 2019a;Dutt et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2020;Jia and Wang, 2020;Huang and Wang, 2021;Jia et al, 2021;Alquezar et al, 2022;Jia et al, 2022;Mahmoud et al, 2022;Parajuli et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022bHuang et al, , 2023Su et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, canker-resistant Duncan grapefruit was developed through editing CsLOB1 coding region using SpCas9/gRNA (Jia et al, 2017b). Moreover, canker-resistant Duncan grapefruit, Hamlin, Pummelo and Wanjincheng orange were created by disrupting EBE pthA4 or the TATA box of CsLOB1 using spCas9/gRNA, LbCas12a/crRNA and base editor (Peng et al, 2017;Jia and Wang, 2020;Jia et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2022b). However, it must be kept in mind that all of the aforementioned canker-resistant genome-edited citrus plants are transgenic, which have not been commercialized owing to regulations and public perception concerns (Jia et al, 2006;Gong et al, 2021;Turnbull et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation