2014
DOI: 10.1017/s2045796014000171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basal ganglia and restricted and repetitive behaviours in Autism Spectrum Disorders: current status and future perspectives

Abstract: This Section of Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences appears in each issue of the Journal to stress the relevance of epidemiology for behavioural neurosciences, reporting the results of studies that explore the use of an epidemiological approach to provide a better understanding of the neural basis of major psychiatric disorders and, in turn, the utilisation of the behavioural neurosciences for promoting innovative epidemiological research.The ultimate aim is to help the translation of most relevant research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the findings for hippocampus and caudate volumes were only nominally significant despite the large cross sectional sample, they are consistent with the possible involvement of the caudate and hippocampus in ASD (Stanfield et al, 2008; Calderoni et al, 2014). Our finding of pallidum enlargement was not hypothesized based on studies published to date and warrants replication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Though the findings for hippocampus and caudate volumes were only nominally significant despite the large cross sectional sample, they are consistent with the possible involvement of the caudate and hippocampus in ASD (Stanfield et al, 2008; Calderoni et al, 2014). Our finding of pallidum enlargement was not hypothesized based on studies published to date and warrants replication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Higher FA values related to cingulum in ASD versus other-DD were also Bashat et al, 2007;Billeci et al, 2012;Weinstein et al, 2011]. Little evidence from DTI studies exists on the basal ganglia networks, even if volumetric MRI studies indicate those regions as presenting higher volumes and being related to repetitive symptoms of ASD [Calderoni et al, 2014]. Little evidence from DTI studies exists on the basal ganglia networks, even if volumetric MRI studies indicate those regions as presenting higher volumes and being related to repetitive symptoms of ASD [Calderoni et al, 2014].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is not surprising as the cingulum is considered as a key region for socio-communicative skill development and its alteration in ASD has been widely reported also in older subjects [Ameis et al, 2013;Hoppenbrouwers et al, 2014;Ikuta et al, 2014]. Little evidence from DTI studies exists on the basal ganglia networks, even if volumetric MRI studies indicate those regions as presenting higher volumes and being related to repetitive symptoms of ASD [Calderoni et al, 2014]. Higher FA values have been detected within the putamen in adolescents [Cheng et al, 2010] and school-age children [Brito et al, 2009], while Langen et al [2012] found that adults with autism had a significantly smaller total brain white matter volume, lower fractional anisotropy of white matter tracts connecting putamen to frontal cortical areas, higher mean diffusivity of white matter tracts connecting accumbens to frontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the exact etiopathogenesis of ASD remains unclear, with predominant theories proposing genetic factors affecting cortical migration (Nickl‐Jockschat and Michel, 2011) and synaptic regulation (Takahashi et al, 2012), and altered developmental processes leading to both hypo‐ and hyper‐connectivity in different brain regions (Conti et al, 2017; Kana et al, 2014; Muller et al, 2011), specifically local over‐connectivity, long distance under connectivity (Wass, 2011), and excessive growth in several brain regions (Polšek et al, 2011). Consequently, there have been a wide range of structural brain regions implicated with ASD, most commonly that of early brain overgrowth and head circumference (Mosconi et al, 2009; Sacco et al, 2015), as well as more localised brain regions that may be associated with the social and motor impairments characteristic of ASD, including the frontal lobes, amygdala, cerebellum (Amaral et al, 2008; Li et al, 2017; Sivapalan and Aitchison, 2014), corpus callosum (Bellani et al, 2013; Hrdlicka, 2008; Stigler et al, 2011) and basal ganglia (Calderoni et al, 2014; Dougherty et al, 2016a). However, there has not yet been an agreement on structural changes in the brain that reflect these underlying mechanisms of ASD, limiting the utility of machine learning to provide accurate diagnoses of ASD and patient prognoses (Kassraian‐Fard et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%