2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basal CD34 + Cell Count Predicts Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Healthy Donors after Administration of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor: A Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cohort Study

Abstract: A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study on healthy donors (HDs) was designed to identify predictors of CD34 + cells on day 5 with emphasis on the predictive value of the basal CD34 + cell count. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume as well as white blood cell count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, platelet count, hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34 + cell counts were determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak ANC ( P =0.03) and WBC count ( P =0.05), but not CD34 + cell count ( P =0.65), increased with increasing dose level. As previously reported in healthy donors, 13 , 30 , 31 there was a strong correlation of peak CD34 + count with baseline CD34 + concentration (Kendall tau=0.68, P =0.0006) but no correlation was observed with baseline ANC (Kendall tau=0.09, P =0.66) or baseline WBC count (Kendall tau=0.13, P =0.49) ( Figure 2 ). There was also no correlation, as previously reported, 13 with baseline platelet count (Kendall tau=0.30, P =0.13) or donor age (Kendall tau=0.14, P =0.49).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peak ANC ( P =0.03) and WBC count ( P =0.05), but not CD34 + cell count ( P =0.65), increased with increasing dose level. As previously reported in healthy donors, 13 , 30 , 31 there was a strong correlation of peak CD34 + count with baseline CD34 + concentration (Kendall tau=0.68, P =0.0006) but no correlation was observed with baseline ANC (Kendall tau=0.09, P =0.66) or baseline WBC count (Kendall tau=0.13, P =0.49) ( Figure 2 ). There was also no correlation, as previously reported, 13 with baseline platelet count (Kendall tau=0.30, P =0.13) or donor age (Kendall tau=0.14, P =0.49).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…4 However, we also observed a strong correlation between baseline CD34 + and peak CD34 + concentrations, as previously reported with both G-CSF and plerixafor mobilization in healthy donors (Kendall tau=0.68, P =0.0006). 13 , 30 , 31 Factors contributing to baseline CD34 count remain unclear, but our data and others’ suggest that baseline CD34 + concentration may be affected by hydroxyurea-related myelosuppression. 24 , 33 Patient #8, a subject re-enrolled in the study, was particularly instructive regarding this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This study was a longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study. One hundred twenty-two consecutive siblings, white HDs, were referred to the Transplant Program of the Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" of Reggio Calabria (Italy), in which 111 (91%) were from the cohort of the previous study [27] and 11 (9%) were new cases. HDs received a subcutaneous injection of G-CSF, lenograstim, once daily in the morning at a dose of 10 mg/kg BW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our clinical study described a graphic algorithm (independent of age, sex, blood volume [BV], and BW) by which it is possible to predict CD34 + mobilization on day 5 using baseline CD34 + values [27]. Herein we designed a longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study aimed at testing whether the baseline PB CD34 + cell count is also able to predict the effectiveness of allogeneic PBSC mobilization as soon as day 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in an attempt to make up for poor mobilization results, total blood to be processed is significantly higher in donors with poor mobilization. Other strategies for predicting poor mobilization results are currently being explored by other groups, such as the evaluation of circulating CD34+ cell basal levels before mobilization as a predictor of mobilization effectiveness . More complex approaches could include the search of single nucleotide polymorphisms involved on mobilization and the study of the G‐CSF receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%