2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.76.043502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baryon asymmetry in a heavy moduli scenario

Abstract: In some models of supersymmetry breaking, modulus fields are heavy enough to decay before BBN. But the large entropy produced via moduli decay significantly dilutes the preexisting baryon asymmetry of the universe. We study whether Affleck-Dine mechanism can provide enough baryon asymmetry which survives the dilution, and find several situations in which desirable amount of baryon number remains after the dilution. The possibility of non-thermal dark matter is also discussed. This provides the realistic cosmol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of a flat direction lifted at dimension-8 and invariant under the Standard Model and U(1) ′ gauge groups include: φ 4 FD = N LLĒ and NŪDD, where we impose R-parity to forbid a lifting term of dimension-4. A detailed account of Affleck-Dine leptogenesis (baryogenesis) and moduli decay can be found in [27]. Other, highly efficient, non-standard leptogenesis mechanisms (such as resonant leptogenesis [28]) are also possible, but less generic.…”
Section: Moduli Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of a flat direction lifted at dimension-8 and invariant under the Standard Model and U(1) ′ gauge groups include: φ 4 FD = N LLĒ and NŪDD, where we impose R-parity to forbid a lifting term of dimension-4. A detailed account of Affleck-Dine leptogenesis (baryogenesis) and moduli decay can be found in [27]. Other, highly efficient, non-standard leptogenesis mechanisms (such as resonant leptogenesis [28]) are also possible, but less generic.…”
Section: Moduli Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to ensuring dark matter stability, the Z 2 symmetry excludes an HΦ † term, which would give Φ a tadpole when H gets a VEV. With the convention in (27), perturbativity requires that k 1 , k 2 < 0.8 and k 3 < 3.1. There are additional constraints to avoid hitting a Landau pole below the GUT scale, but this is highly dependent on what other fields couple to H and Φ (for example, the quartic terms could have large contributions from integrating out other weak scale particles) so we do not consider this as a constraint.…”
Section: Field Content and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moduli with masses above 20 TeV decay before Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN); however, if they are sufficiently light (typically below 10 4 TeV) they result in a very low reheat temperature, which is below a GeV. The decay of the modulus generates a large amount of entropy, which dilutes any baryon asymmetry that was created in a previous era (the dilution factor may be as large as ∼ 10 9 [10]). Generating sufficient baryon asymmetry below a GeV is a challenging task since sphaleron transitions are exponentially suppressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence we have two possibilities for baryogenesis. One is to create a sufficiently large amount of baryon asymmetry before the moduli decay by, e.g., the Affleck-Dine mechanism [9,10], which has been extensively studied in a context of modular cosmology [11][12][13][14][15][16]. The other is to generate baryon asymmetry after the moduli decay.…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)062mentioning
confidence: 99%