Barriers to Using Open Government Data

Wieczorkowski, Jędrzej

doi:10.1145/3340017.3340022

Cited by 14 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(Mishra et al, 2017) Assessment of Open Government Data Initiative -A Perception Driven Approach (Li et al, 2018) Quality assessment for open government data in China (Sanabria et al, 2018) Colombian case study for the analysis of open data government: A data quality approach (Alromaih et al, 2016) A proposed checklist for the technical maturity of open government data: An application on GCC countries (H. J. Wang & Lo, 2016) Adoption of open government data among government agencies Open government data assessment model: An indicator development in Thailand (Ruijer et al, 2017) Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use (Torchiano et al, 2017) Preserving the Benefits of Open Government Data by Measuring and Improving Their Quality: An Empirical Study (Craveiro et al, 2016) (Wieczorkowski, 2019) Barriers to Using Open Government Data (Styrin et al, 2016) Open data and open government: From Abstract principles to institutionalized practices (Köster & Suárez, 2016) Open data for development: Experience of Uruguay (Hu et al, 2016) Readiness assessment of open government data programs: A case of Shenzhen (Talukder et al, 2019) Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh The Study of Public Organization's Intention to Use an Open government Data Assessment Application : Testing with an applicable TAM…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this case, data primary collector method is observation, in which it could be done by OGD portal/website pages searching and collecting dataset to assessment process or problem analysis. This researches are conducted by Torchiano et al (2017), Wieczorkowski (2019), Li et al (2018), Sanabria et al (2018), and Zheng & Gao (2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…methods From the data, it can be seen that dominantly the Open Government Data research used observation for its data collection method, as previous researches by Zheng & Gao (2016), Idowu et al (2018), Li et al (2018), Sanabria et al (2018), Alromaih et al (2016), Torchiano et al (2017), Wieczorkowski (2019), Styrin et al (2016), and Köster & Suárez (2016). The observation does the data search in the Open Government Data portals.…”

Section: Figure 8papers Based On Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Specifically, the assessment is designed to measure how big the users acceptance rate of the Open Government Data implementation, as previous researches by Talukder Zheng & Gao (2016). Besides that, the assessment is also applied to measure data quality, as previous researches by Li et al (2018), Sanabria et al (2018), Torchiano et al (2017), measure the maturity as previous research by Wieczorkowski (2019), Alromaih et al (2016), and also to measure the readiness as previous research by Hu et al (2016).…”

Section: Figure 5 Papers Based On Focus Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Literature Review on Open Government Data

Maulana

2020

masy. telematika dan inf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 8papers Based On Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Figure 5 Papers Based On Focus Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Literature Review on Open Government Data

Maulana

2020

masy. telematika dan inf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Schools' systems were not configured in ways that presumed staff might want to access data. Outputs took the form of static, non-editable and therefore 'closed' PDF reports (see Wieczorkowski, 2019). Conversely, even these inadequate forms of data systems required substantial amounts of work to maintain, sustain and repair.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Attending to data: Exploring the use of attendance data within the datafied school

Selwyn

Pangrazio

Cumbo

2021

Research in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contemporary schooling is seen to be altering significantly in light of a combined ‘digitisation’ and ‘datafication’ of key processes. This paper examines the nature and conditions of the datafied school by exploring how a relatively prosaic and longstanding school metric (student attendance data) is being produced and used in digital form. Drawing on empirical data taken from in-depth qualitative studies in three contrasting Australian secondary schools, the paper considers ‘anticipatory’, ‘analytical’ and ‘administrative’ aspects of how digitally-mediated attendance data is produced, used and imagined by school staff. Our findings foreground a number of constraints, compromises and inconsistencies that are usually glossed-over in enthusiasms for ‘data-driven’ education. It is argued that these findings highlight the messy realities of schools’ current relationships with digital data, and the broader logics of school datafications.

show abstract

Enthusiastic and Grounded, Avoidant and Cautious: Understanding Public Receptivity to Data and Visualizations

He,

Walny,

Thoma

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite an abundance of open data initiatives aimed to inform and empower "general" audiences, we still know little about the ways people outside of traditional data analysis communities experience and engage with public data and visualizations. To investigate this gap, we present results from an in-depth qualitative interview study with 19 participants from diverse ethnic, occupational, and demographic backgrounds. Our findings characterize a set of lived experiences with open data and visualizations in the domain of energy consumption, production, and transmission. This work exposes information receptivity -an individual's transient state of willingness or openness to receive information -as a blind spot for the data visualization community, complementary to but distinct from previous notions of data visualization literacy and engagement. We observed four clusters of receptivity responses to data-and visualization-based rhetoric: Information-Avoidant, Data-Cautious, Data-Enthusiastic, and Domain-Grounded. Based on our findings, we highlight research opportunities for the visualization community. This exploratory work identifies the existence of diverse receptivity responses, highlighting the need to consider audiences with varying levels of openness to new information. Our findings also suggest new approaches for improving the accessibility and inclusivity of open data and visualization initiatives targeted at broad audiences. A free copy of this paper and all supplemental materials are available at https://OSF.IO/MPQ32.

show abstract

Barriers to Using Open Government Data

Cited by 14 publications

References 7 publications

A Literature Review on Open Government Data

A Literature Review on Open Government Data

Attending to data: Exploring the use of attendance data within the datafied school

Enthusiastic and Grounded, Avoidant and Cautious: Understanding Public Receptivity to Data and Visualizations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About