Barriers to the pedestrianization of city centres: perspectives from the Global North and the Global South

Abstract

Drawing on personal interviews with local planners, this paper examines barriers to the pedestrianization of city centres in two contrasting settings, one in a Global North city (Brisbane, Australia) and the other in a Global South city (Kathmandu, Nepal). These cases are illuminating because Brisbane already contains a popular three-block pedestrian mall in its CBD (Central Business District), but proposals to expand it have not met with support, whereas Kathmandu's plans to pedestrianize its busy historic centre have failed so far. While the cultural and economic circumstances of Brisbane and Kathmandu vary significantly, there are similarities as well as differences in their barriers to pedestrianization. The barriers include: (1) opposition from residents and motorists; (2) opposition from local merchants; (3) cost recovery; (4) access of delivery vehicles; (5) management of alternative transport and parking; (6) enforcement; and (7) institutional and political support. These types of barriers are certainly not unique to these two cities. It is very probable that similar issues are encountered in other Global North and Global South cities. It is clear that political, institutional and social barriers are more significant than technical and financial barriers. A dominating car culture is responsible for the general lack of commitment to pedestrianization.

Глобальные Города: Многокритериальная Оценка Устойчивого Развития

“…Проведенный нами сравнительный анализ трех наиболее известных систем оценивания устойчивого развития городов, а именно Индикаторов целей устойчивого развития ООН 22 , Стандарта ISO 37120 «Устойчивое развитие сообществ» 2014 23 И.А. ШМЕЛЕВА, С.Э.…”

Using Smart City Tools to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Low Emissions Zone in Spain: Madrid Central

“…As about 80% of this pollution associated with health problems is produced by cars [6], reducing traffic seems to be an efficient strategy to improve urban livability and inhabitants' health. Thus, many cities around the world have started to shift toward non-car friendly access (pedestrianization measures) because it is an effective and non-expensive way to reduce air pollution and noise [3,[7][8][9][10].…”

Using Smart City Tools to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Low Emissions Zone in Spain: Madrid Central

“…As about 80% of this pollution associated with health problems is produced by cars [6], reducing traffic seems to be an efficient strategy to improve urban livability and their inhabitants' health. Thus, many cities around the world started to shift toward non-car friendly access (pedestrianization measures) because is an effective and non-expensive way to reduce air pollution and noise [3,[7][8][9][10].…”