Barriers to the management of obstructed defaecation according to colorectal surgeons

Al‐Mozany, N.; Wright, Casey M.; O’Grady, Greg; Young, Christopher J.; Solomon, Michael J.

doi:10.1111/codi.13665

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fig. 3A [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and Supplementary Table 3, respectively, show a summarised and expanded list of these surveys and their RRs. For published surveys, the mean ± SD of RR from CSSANZ members was 53% ± 18.3%, as depicted in Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Pertaining to the Colorectal Surgery Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) Executive and Research Support Committee, this study aimed to assess the usefulness and outcomes of surveys sent out by the society to its members.Methods: From 2009 to 2017, CSSANZ members received 38 surveys, most of which were distributed from within the society, and a few of which originated from other affiliated groups. Surveys were categorised by type, topics, times required for completion, delivery method, response rates, and advancement to publication.Results: Of 38 surveys, 20 (53%) were published and 18 remain unpublished. Four surveys were distributed annually on average, with 2.2 published annually on average, with a mean impact factor of 2.41 ± 1.55. Mean time to publication was 31 ± 17 months. Surveys contributed to 13 publications (34%). The most common survey topics were rectal cancer decisionmaking, in 6 publications (16%), preoperative assessment of colorectal patients, in 5 publications (13%), and anal physiology: continence and defaecation, in 4 publications (11%). Publication of surveys was not related to the number of surveys distributed per year, the number of questions per survey, or the time required by respondents to complete the surveys.Conclusion: Most of the CSSANZ-distributed surveys resulted in publications, and one third of the surveys contributed to higher degrees obtained by investigators. These surveys aid research into areas that are otherwise difficult to assess, often indicating areas for future research.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Unusual Presentation of Obstructive Defecation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Définition et mesure de l’obstruction à la défécation

Siproudhis

2019

Colon Rectum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le syndrome d’obstruction défécatoire est une situation peu satisfaisante à la fois pour les malades qui s’en plaignent et les médecins consultés. Les premiers ont des réticences à évoquer des symptômes jugés dégradants. Les seconds ont des difficultés de prise en charge liées à des stratégies peu différenciées (constipation). Cependant, une évaluation symptomatique précise (consistance des selles), un examen dynamique anorectal (anisme, rectocèle) et un test d’expulsion au ballonnet permettent de planifier la prise en charge dans les situations les plus habituelles.

show abstract

Barriers to the management of obstructed defaecation according to colorectal surgeons

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand

The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand

An Unusual Presentation of Obstructive Defecation

Définition et mesure de l’obstruction à la défécation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About