2009
DOI: 10.1155/2010/878135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to the Implementation of Practice Guidelines in Managing Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Qualitative Approach

Abstract: In the present study population, ER, ICU and nurses did not adhere to NVUGIB guidelines because they were neither aware of nor familiar with them, whereas the GI lack of adherence to NVUGIB guidelines was influenced more by attitudinal and contextual barriers. These findings can guide the design of multifaceted educational and behavioural interventions when attempting to effectively disseminate existing guidelines, and for guideline implementation into practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…79 Furthermore, our findings are supported by implementation studies of other interprofessional protocols identifying policy and protocol factors such as unclear role responsibilities, timing for protocol completion, and challenges learning complex protocols as barriers to successful implementation. 17,18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 Furthermore, our findings are supported by implementation studies of other interprofessional protocols identifying policy and protocol factors such as unclear role responsibilities, timing for protocol completion, and challenges learning complex protocols as barriers to successful implementation. 17,18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No systematic investigation of why such patients are admitted has been undertaken. Several previous studies ▶ have examined barriers to, and attempted to improve, adherence to practice guidelines recommending the use of risk scores for UGIB [24,25]. These studies were focused at practitioner rather than patient level factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durante el ingreso solo en el 25% de centros el responsable directo de la atención al enfermo es el especialista de aparato digestivo: ello se ha comprobado que puede influir en la aplicación correcta de los recursos terapéuticos marcados por las guías clínicas 12,13 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified