2016
DOI: 10.1080/10538720.2016.1155518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations

Abstract: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) organizations are spaces in which LGBTQ individuals can access support and community, yet they have received little empirical attention, particularly outside urban areas. Given the benefits of LGBTQ community involvement, this study examined the barriers to involvement in nonmetropolitan LGBTQ organizations. Three qualitative methods were employed: interviews, focus groups, and participant observation sessions. Thematic analyses identified eight barriers o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the survey did not include questions on how long participants had volunteered, time spent per week volunteering or whether volunteering was a positive experience for them, which may be important questions to examine in future research. In addition to poorer health and well-being being a potential barrier to volunteering, there may be other barriers to involvement in volunteering, such as concerns around sexual orientation disclosure or a perceived lack of diversity within organisations (Paceley, et al, 2016). Future research is needed to examine volunteering activities in older lesbian and gay people in greater detail, and how these factors may be related to well-being outcomes.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the survey did not include questions on how long participants had volunteered, time spent per week volunteering or whether volunteering was a positive experience for them, which may be important questions to examine in future research. In addition to poorer health and well-being being a potential barrier to volunteering, there may be other barriers to involvement in volunteering, such as concerns around sexual orientation disclosure or a perceived lack of diversity within organisations (Paceley, et al, 2016). Future research is needed to examine volunteering activities in older lesbian and gay people in greater detail, and how these factors may be related to well-being outcomes.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has also documented that community health centers have been vital to fostering regular screening of STIs and support for the continuity of HIV/AIDS care (e.g., diagnosis, treatment, follow-ups) for MSM [75]; greater accessibility to sexual health services (e.g., STI testing, provision of lubricants and condoms) and new knowledge [76]; and the consistent engagement of MSM in the healthcare delivery system prior to an HIV diagnosis and this engagement's important connection to subsequent desired health outcomes [77]. The work of ASOs has led to increased opportunities for community involvement among MSM [78]; heightened awareness of concerns and issues relevant to the larger LGBTQ community [79]; and paths for developing social support networks and individual self-esteem [80]. Since the early 1980's, ASOs have been the most accessible community resource for reliable information and updates on HIV/AIDS [81][82][83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGBTQ+ community activity is sometimes limited in rural areas, particularly in the South and Midwest (U.S.). Paceley et al (2016) explored LGBTQ+ community in a nonmetropolitan Midwestern county and found several barriers to LGBTQ+ individuals' community connections, including marginalization based on other identities, hostile groups, exclusionary practices by LGBTQ+ groups, and community size. Little is known, however, about geographic factors and connection to the LGBTQ + community among youth with LGBTQ+ parents.…”
Section: Lgbtq+ Community Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%