2018
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to ecosystem restoration presented by soil legacy effects of invasive alien N2‐fixing woody species: implications for ecological restoration

Abstract: Impacts of invasive alien N 2 -fixing woody species and how they can persist as soil legacy effects after invasive species control are well appreciated, but how soil legacy effects can present barriers to restoration is poorly understood. Finding better ways to deal with these barriers to restoration is essential to improving restoration outcomes. In this study, we review 440 studies to identify barriers to restoration and potential management actions for the barriers to restoration, and provide practical appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direction of the feedback can be negative, where nutrients are immobilized or depleted or pathogens accumulate; or, can be positive, where nutrients or mutualists accumulate [27]. "Soil legacy effects" are commonly studied in the context of invasive plant species that possess the power to engineer changes in ecosystem of the invaded habitats [28]. This subset of the plant-soil feedback agenda is often invoked for discussing allelopathic properties that remain in soils following invasive plant species growth.…”
Section: Plant-soil Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of the feedback can be negative, where nutrients are immobilized or depleted or pathogens accumulate; or, can be positive, where nutrients or mutualists accumulate [27]. "Soil legacy effects" are commonly studied in the context of invasive plant species that possess the power to engineer changes in ecosystem of the invaded habitats [28]. This subset of the plant-soil feedback agenda is often invoked for discussing allelopathic properties that remain in soils following invasive plant species growth.…”
Section: Plant-soil Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedbacks likely to result in regime shifts were related to processes associated with seed banks, fire and nutrient cycling (Gaertner et al 2014). A recent review of soil legacy effects resulting from invasion by alien N 2 -fixing woody species identified several potential barriers to restoration following alien control (Nsikani et al 2018). Biotic barriers included altered soil microbial communities, depleted native seed banks, secondary invasions of alien species, and weedy native species dominance.…”
Section: Biological Invasions and Restoration Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is controlled by abiotic limitations that result from amplified biotic interactions and restoration requires manipulation of the physical environment in addition to the biotic components. Where alien species incur legacy effects such as N enrichment (Nsikani et al 2018), this may be a barrier to restoration and may require the physical removal of nutrient-rich biomass (Marchante et al 2009), the manipulation of soil nutrients (Zink and Allen 1998; Török et al 2000), or the use of fire to volatilise excess nutrients. In many cases, biotic and abiotic threshold effects are closely linked and may occur simultaneously.…”
Section: Ecological Restoration Following Invasion: a Conceptual Frammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to our knowledge there is no restoration strategy that can be successfully used to restore overall native soil chemistry, although methods to immobilize elevated nitrogen are available. If elevated nitrogen availability, legacy of altered soil microbial communities and nitrophilic weedy species prove to be barriers to native species re-establishment during restoration; we urge practicing restoration ecologists to incorporate management actions such as soil carbon addition, soil microbial treatments and prescribed burning into their restoration programs (reviewed in Nsikani et al, 2018).…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%