Barriers to and facilitators of effective communication in perinatal care: a qualitative study of the experiences of birthing people with sensory, intellectual, and/or developmental disabilities
Abstract:Background
Effective provider-patient communication is a key element of quality health care, including perinatal care. What constitutes “effective communication” in perinatal care may vary according to the population seeking care, such as women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and sensory disabilities. Research broadly indicates that communication issues are among the barriers to perinatal care experienced by women with disabilities. However, few studies have explicitly ex… Show more
“…First, the accessibility needs of people with disabilities must be met. This includes care spaces that are accessible to people with physical and sensory disabilities (e.g., post‐birth recovery room, NICUs, paediatrician's offices) (Tarasoff, 2017), ASL interpreters and tactile or technological resources for people with sensory disabilities, and multiple communication options for people with intellectual/developmental disabilities (e.g., simple sentences, image‐based materials) (Andrews et al, 2021; Saeed et al, 2022). Second, care should be multidisciplinary, with coordination across perinatal and allied health care providers, disability‐specific providers (e.g., rheumatologists), and disability and social services (Mitra, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we followed a reflexive thematic analysis approach, wherein we aimed to “provide a coherent and compelling interpretation of the data, grounded in the data,” while accounting for our active role in the knowledge production process (Braun et al, 2018, p. 6). As a research team comprised of peer researchers and senior and junior researchers with expertise in public health, psychology, perinatal health, and disability, we were reflexive of our lived experiences and knowledge of related research, including prior research conducted by our team (e.g., Saeed et al, 2022; Tarasoff, 2017), during data collection and analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies conducted in numerous countries, including the United States, Canada, Ireland, Nepal, and Cameroon, have documented care‐related challenges experienced by people with disabilities in pregnancy (Heideveld‐Gerritsen et al, 2021; Kazembe et al, 2022; Malouf, McLeish, et al, 2017); barriers to prenatal care experienced by people with disabilities include fragmented care, unmet physical accessibility and communication needs, and negative provider attitudes (Saeed et al, 2022;). Few studies have focused on postpartum care specifically.…”
AimTo understand the postpartum care received by birthing people with disabilities and their newborns, from their own perspectives.DesignA qualitative study with semi‐structured interviews.MethodsBetween July 2019 and February 2020, in‐person and virtual interviews were conducted with 31 people with physical, sensory, and intellectual/developmental disabilities in Ontario, Canada, about the formal inpatient and outpatient services and supports they used in the first few months after they gave birth. Thematic analysis was used identify common themes.ResultsWe identified three overall themes concerning participants' postpartum care experiences and the different types of formal services received in and out of hospital: (1) lack of adequate care, (2) lack of provider awareness of disability and disability accommodations, and (3) fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance. The identified themes were applicable across disability groups. However, most comments on disability accommodations came from participants with physical or sensory disabilities, while participants with intellectual/developmental disabilities most commonly reported concerns about lack of adequate care and fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance.ConclusionFindings indicate that postpartum care often fails people with disabilities. This could contribute to negative health consequences for them and their newborns.ImpactBirthing people with disabilities need multidisciplinary, proactive, and strengths‐based postpartum care to mitigate risk for health complications. Further, disability‐related training and guidelines for health and social service providers is required.Reporting methodConsolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).Patient or Public contributionOur research team included two peer researchers with physical disabilities who served as co‐interviewers and participated in data analysis, contributing their lived experience of disability and interactions with the health care system. All stages of the study were also informed by feedback from the study's Advisory Committee, which comprised women with disabilities (many of whom are parents), disability organization staff, clinicians, and policy representatives.
“…First, the accessibility needs of people with disabilities must be met. This includes care spaces that are accessible to people with physical and sensory disabilities (e.g., post‐birth recovery room, NICUs, paediatrician's offices) (Tarasoff, 2017), ASL interpreters and tactile or technological resources for people with sensory disabilities, and multiple communication options for people with intellectual/developmental disabilities (e.g., simple sentences, image‐based materials) (Andrews et al, 2021; Saeed et al, 2022). Second, care should be multidisciplinary, with coordination across perinatal and allied health care providers, disability‐specific providers (e.g., rheumatologists), and disability and social services (Mitra, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we followed a reflexive thematic analysis approach, wherein we aimed to “provide a coherent and compelling interpretation of the data, grounded in the data,” while accounting for our active role in the knowledge production process (Braun et al, 2018, p. 6). As a research team comprised of peer researchers and senior and junior researchers with expertise in public health, psychology, perinatal health, and disability, we were reflexive of our lived experiences and knowledge of related research, including prior research conducted by our team (e.g., Saeed et al, 2022; Tarasoff, 2017), during data collection and analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies conducted in numerous countries, including the United States, Canada, Ireland, Nepal, and Cameroon, have documented care‐related challenges experienced by people with disabilities in pregnancy (Heideveld‐Gerritsen et al, 2021; Kazembe et al, 2022; Malouf, McLeish, et al, 2017); barriers to prenatal care experienced by people with disabilities include fragmented care, unmet physical accessibility and communication needs, and negative provider attitudes (Saeed et al, 2022;). Few studies have focused on postpartum care specifically.…”
AimTo understand the postpartum care received by birthing people with disabilities and their newborns, from their own perspectives.DesignA qualitative study with semi‐structured interviews.MethodsBetween July 2019 and February 2020, in‐person and virtual interviews were conducted with 31 people with physical, sensory, and intellectual/developmental disabilities in Ontario, Canada, about the formal inpatient and outpatient services and supports they used in the first few months after they gave birth. Thematic analysis was used identify common themes.ResultsWe identified three overall themes concerning participants' postpartum care experiences and the different types of formal services received in and out of hospital: (1) lack of adequate care, (2) lack of provider awareness of disability and disability accommodations, and (3) fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance. The identified themes were applicable across disability groups. However, most comments on disability accommodations came from participants with physical or sensory disabilities, while participants with intellectual/developmental disabilities most commonly reported concerns about lack of adequate care and fear of judgement, discrimination, and intrusive surveillance.ConclusionFindings indicate that postpartum care often fails people with disabilities. This could contribute to negative health consequences for them and their newborns.ImpactBirthing people with disabilities need multidisciplinary, proactive, and strengths‐based postpartum care to mitigate risk for health complications. Further, disability‐related training and guidelines for health and social service providers is required.Reporting methodConsolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).Patient or Public contributionOur research team included two peer researchers with physical disabilities who served as co‐interviewers and participated in data analysis, contributing their lived experience of disability and interactions with the health care system. All stages of the study were also informed by feedback from the study's Advisory Committee, which comprised women with disabilities (many of whom are parents), disability organization staff, clinicians, and policy representatives.
“…Women with disabilities also face multiple unremitting barriers to receiving equitable care including physical or health system barriers such as inaccessible medical facilities and equipment, lack of interpreter services and other communication barriers, financial limitations and widespread discriminatory attitudes and biases of providers who question their ability for pregnancy, childbirth and parenting (Saeed et al, 2022 ; Tarasoff, 2017 ). Moreover, clinical tools may not be accessible to them.…”
Aims:The aim of the current study was to compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms during the perinatal period among respondents with a disability as compared to those without a disability.
Design:We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 24 participating United States between 2018 and 2020.
Methods:A cross-sectional sample of 37,989 respondents provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication and self-care. The outcome of interest was perinatal depressive symptoms, defined as experiencing depressive symptoms during the antenatal period or postpartum period.Regression models were used to calculate odds of depressive symptoms during these two time periods by disability status while controlling for relevant sociodemographic characteristics and depressive symptoms prior to pregnancy.Results: Respondents with disabilities experienced a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms in both the antenatal period and postpartum period as compared to those without disabilities. In fully adjusted models, respondents with disabilities had 2.4 times the odds of experiencing depressive symptoms during pregnancy and 2.1 times the odds of experiencing postpartum depressive symptoms as compared to respondents without disabilities.
Conclusion:Respondents with disabilities experience a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms throughout the perinatal period thereby increasing the risk for adverse maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes.
“…Faulty communication behavior is exacerbated by rapid team changes, high workloads, and lack of mutual respect. Lack of communication training and awareness of its importance leads to loss of essential information and compromises patient safety [ 7 , 8 ]. PAEs can be attributed to inadequate communication in up to 70% of cases [ 9 ].…”
Background
Progress in medicine involves the structured analysis and communication of errors. Comparability between the individual disciplines is only possible to a limited extent and obstetrics plays a special role: the expectation of a self-determined and joyful event meets with possibly serious complications in highly complex care situations. This must be managed by an interdisciplinary team with an increasingly condensed workload. Adverse events cannot be completely controlled. However, taking controllable risk factors into account and with a focused communication a reduction of preventable adverse events is possible. In the present study, the effect of interprofessional team training on preventable adverse events in an obstetric department was investigated.
Methods
The training consisted of a 4-h interdisciplinary training session based on psychological theories. Preventable adverse events were defined in six categories according to potential patterns of causation. 2,865 case records of a refence year (2018) and 2,846 case records of the year after the intervention (2020) were retrospectively evaluated. To determine the communication training effect, the identified preventable adverse events of 2018 and 2020 were compared according to categories and analyzed for obstetrically relevant controllable and uncontrollable risk factors. Questionnaires were used to identify improvements in self-reported perceptions and behaviors.
Results
The results show that preventable adverse events in obstetrics were significantly reduced after the intervention compared to the reference year before the intervention (13.35% in the year 2018 vs. 8.83% in 2020, p < 0.005). Moreover, obstetrically controllable risk factors show a significant reduction in the year after the communication training. The questionnaires revealed an increase in perceived patient safety (t(28) = 4.09, p < .001), perceived communication behavior (t(30) = -2.95, p = .006), and self-efficacy to cope with difficult situations (t(28) = -2.64, p = .013).
Conclusions
This study shows that the communication training was able to reduce preventable adverse events and thus increase patient safety. In the future, regular trainings should be implemented alongside medical emergency trainings in obstetrics to improve patient safety. Additionally, this leads to the strengthening of human factors and ultimately also to the prevention of second victims. Further research should follow up implementing active control groups and a randomized-controlled trail study design.
Trial registration
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University Hospital (protocol code 114/19-FSt/Sta, date of approval 29 May 2019), study registration: NCT03855735.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.