2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to addressing perinatal mental health issues in midwifery settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
66
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The review process identified 30 papers that met inclusion criteria (see Table ). Included studies regard the knowledge, skills and attitudes of midwives (Hauck et al., ; Higgins et al., ; Jones, Creedy, & Gamble, , ,; Lau, McCauley, Barnfield, Moss, & Cross, ; Legere et al., ; Mathibe‐Neke, Rothberg, & Langley, ; McCauley et al., ; Noonan, Doody, Jomeen, & Galvin, ; Noonan et al., ; Ross‐Davie, Elliott, Sarkar, & Green, ; Rothera & Oates, ), and student midwives (Higgins, Carroll, & Sharek, ; Jarrett, , ; Phillips, ); the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving knowledge and skills (Davies et al., ; Fenwick, Toohill, Slavin, Creedy, & Gamble, ; McLachlan, Forster, Collins, Gunn, & Hegarty, ; Reed, Fenwick, Hauck, Gamble, & Creedy, ); the delivery of counselling or psychosocial interventions by midwives (Clarke, King, & Prost, ; Fenwick et al., , ; Larsson, Karlström, Rubertsson, & Hildingsson, ; Toohill et al., ); and barriers and enablers to embedding midwife‐led mental healthcare in practice (Bayrampour et al., ; Fenwick et al., ; Gamble, Toohill, Slavin, Creedy, & Fenwick, ; Higgins et al., ; Myors, Schmied, Johnson, & Cleary, ; Myors et al., ).…”
Section: Findings/narrative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The review process identified 30 papers that met inclusion criteria (see Table ). Included studies regard the knowledge, skills and attitudes of midwives (Hauck et al., ; Higgins et al., ; Jones, Creedy, & Gamble, , ,; Lau, McCauley, Barnfield, Moss, & Cross, ; Legere et al., ; Mathibe‐Neke, Rothberg, & Langley, ; McCauley et al., ; Noonan, Doody, Jomeen, & Galvin, ; Noonan et al., ; Ross‐Davie, Elliott, Sarkar, & Green, ; Rothera & Oates, ), and student midwives (Higgins, Carroll, & Sharek, ; Jarrett, , ; Phillips, ); the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving knowledge and skills (Davies et al., ; Fenwick, Toohill, Slavin, Creedy, & Gamble, ; McLachlan, Forster, Collins, Gunn, & Hegarty, ; Reed, Fenwick, Hauck, Gamble, & Creedy, ); the delivery of counselling or psychosocial interventions by midwives (Clarke, King, & Prost, ; Fenwick et al., , ; Larsson, Karlström, Rubertsson, & Hildingsson, ; Toohill et al., ); and barriers and enablers to embedding midwife‐led mental healthcare in practice (Bayrampour et al., ; Fenwick et al., ; Gamble, Toohill, Slavin, Creedy, & Fenwick, ; Higgins et al., ; Myors, Schmied, Johnson, & Cleary, ; Myors et al., ).…”
Section: Findings/narrative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in relation to the delivery of counselling or psychosocial interventions by midwives include a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (Clarke et al., ), a single RCT (published in two papers) (Fenwick et al., ; Toohill et al., ), a qualitative interview study (Fenwick et al., ) and a national survey study (Larsson et al., ). Studies that outline barriers and enablers to embedding midwife‐led mental healthcare (other than knowledge and skills deficits), include two integrative reviews (Bayrampour et al., ; Myors et al., ) and three mixed method studies (Fenwick et al., ; Gamble et al., ; Myors et al., ).…”
Section: Findings/narrative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Healthcare professional's knowledge of risk and protective factors associated with PMHPs influences the sensitive inquiry process during consultations with women and their families (Galloway & Hogg, 2015). Moreover, a lack of knowledge of risk factors has been identified as a barrier to screening (Bayrampour, Hapsari, & Pavlovic, 2018). Jomeen, Martin, et al (2018b) The MICA 4 scale is applicable to a variety of healthcare professionals with a higher score suggesting more negative stigma-associated attitudes to mental health (Gabbidon et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%