Barriers in Participative Water Governance: A Critical Analysis of Community Development Approaches

Abstract

Participatory approaches within development programs involving common-pool resources are intended to revive a community’s role in managing these resources. Certainly, to ensure the successful and equitable use of such resources, community participation is essential. However, in many cases, attempts at applying a participatory approach often fail to genuinely engage all subgroups within a community due to assumptions of homogeneity and a lack of understanding of the deep socio-political divisions between people. As a result, development programs can be plagued by these pre-existing power relations, potentially resulting in tokenistic community participation and the continuation of elite capture of natural resources to the same extent or worse than before a development program has begun. This in turn can negatively impact good governance and the fair distribution of a common pool resource. This paper explores the use of participatory approaches in water projects, assessing to what degree power relationships impact water management programs. Using a qualitative approach, the paper identifies key challenges of participatory water governance through case studies from Turkey, India, and Sri Lanka, exploring: lack of social trust, elite capture of participatory processes, power heterogeneity and imbalances at the micro-level, and a lack of inclusive participation in decision-making. Based on the analysis of these case studies, this paper argues that it is essential for participatory development interventions to understand socio-political power relations within a community—an inherently complex and contested space. The so-called “exist-strategies” of a community project play a key role to decide the project sustainability that grants the “community ownership” of the project. Such an understanding can bring about greater success in development interventions attempting to address water-related issues.

Impact of institutional overlapping on water governance of Himalayan City, Nainital, India

“…There should be initiatives stressing the involvement of communities. Overlooking of community governance can be a failure for institutions working on water sector development (Shunglu et al, 2022).…”

Anaerobic Digestion as a Core Technology in Addressing the Global Sanitation Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities

“…105 For researchers focused on the implementation of AD and sanitation in decentralized communities, it is crucial to have nontechnical experts on the team (e.g., social scientists, anthropologists). [100][101][102]104 Because researchers and technology developers need to work closely with communities, they need to be aware of best practices in participatory and "community-engaged" research, 106 including involving communities and users of AD technology in defining and prioritizing problems, as well as codesigning solutions. Building three-way trust between partner NGOs, the user community, and researchers is needed.…”

Decision support system for community managed rainwater harvesting: A case study in the salinity-prone coastal region of Bangladesh

“…Organizational and financial aspects play a crucial role in the sustainability of community-based water supply projects in these countries [ 78 ]. Furthermore, weak governance and regulation often hinder the establishment of effective institutional structures and tariff modalities [ 79 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate socio-economic and GIS-based parameters along with engineering and meteorological parameters for evaluating the performance of RWH systems, especially in the least developed/developing countries [ [80] , [81] , [82] , [83] ].…”