Barriers, emotions, and motivational levers for lifestyle transformation in Norwegian household decarbonization pathways

Abstract

Meeting the Paris Agreement targets requires strong near-term climate change mitigation in all sectors of the economy. Increasing demand-side emission abatement efforts is one important area to pursue, yet there are significant barriers that must be overcome in order to realize its potential. We ask: What barriers may be hindering deep emissions reduction at the household level? What kinds of levers are available to achieve emission reductions? Based on an original and extensive qualitative dataset, our in-depth study of households in Bergen, Norway, shows that individuals perceive they are confronted with considerable individual, economic, and infrastructural barriers that prevent them from taking deep mitigation actions. Our results however also suggest that some barriers can be overcome with motivational levers such as the availability of more sustainable alternatives, support networks and by the positive emotions felt when having a positive impact on the environment. Other barriers are more difficult to overcome, pointing to the overarching lesson from our study that households will need to be forced or incentivized beyond voluntary efforts to achieve rapid and comprehensive decarbonization. The current policy approach, aimed mostly at nudging for voluntary mitigation actions, is wholly inadequate to achieve significant emission reductions. Our study indicates that households are open for increasingly including more “sticks” into climate policymaking. While there are significant challenges to individuals taking stronger mitigation action, these can be overcome by strengthening government policies targeting the patterns and, importantly, volumes of household consumption.

Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries

“…It is clear that a plurality of participants was reflexively concerned that ‘demand-side’ citizen actions and consumer behaviour changes should not relieve the ‘supply-side’ of governmental and industry action. This finding resonates with studies discussing public perceptions of responsibility for climate action, with some valuing individual level efforts such as behaviour change but others valuing structural efforts to change industrial patterns 77 , 78 .…”

Assessment of Energy and Heat Consumption Trends and Forecasting in the Small Consumer Sector in Poland Based on Historical Data

“…Strategies promoting renewables, energy efficiency, and low-carbon tech can notably reduce emissions. Rising electricity use aligns with EU electrification goals, encouraging renewables like solar and wind [174,175]. However, natural gas consumption requires careful management due to its lower emissions but still significant impact [176].…”

Adapting corporations to climate change: How decarbonization impacts the business strategy–performance nexus

“…To begin with, policymakers should incentivize customers to buy decarbonized products. We see that this would entail soft approaches, such as nudging (Moberg et al, 2021), that rely on raising awareness about the need to embrace green products. But this is not a mission for governments alone: Consultancies, business schools, industry associations, or management scholars also have an important role to play in unravelling how decarbonization practices and tools can help maintain business competitiveness while contributing to the fight against climate change (Haque & Ntim, 2022; Olatunji et al, 2019).…”