Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of improvement coaching: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Rushton, Sharron; Lewinski, Allison A.; Hwang, Soohyun; Zullig, Leah L.; Ricks, Katharine A Ball; Ramos, Katherine; Gordon, Adelaide M.; Ear, Belinda; Ballengee, Lindsay A; Brahmajothi, Mulugu V.; Moore, Thomasena S.; Blalock, Dan V.; Williams, John W; Cantrell, Sarah; Gierisch, Jennifer M.; Goldstein, Kenneth M.

doi:10.1111/jocn.16247

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study adds to a growing number of studies that employ matrix or table-based analysis methods (Averill, 2002; Gale et al, 2013; Graetz et al, 2022; G. Hanna et al, 2012; Madsen et al, 2022; Rushton et al, 2023). The web-based matrices used to analyze data in this example included both continuous matrix summaries and interview summaries for each interview participant.…”

Section: Considerations For Qualitative Rapid Analysis In Dfementioning

confidence: 99%

Team-Based Qualitative Rapid Analysis: Approach and Considerations for Conducting Developmental Formative Evaluation for Intervention Design

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Qualitative rapid analysis is one of many rapid research approaches that offer a solution to the problem of time constrained health services evaluations and avoids sacrificing the richness of qualitative data that is needed for intervention design. We describe modifications to an established team-based, rapid analysis approach that we used to rapidly collect and analyze semi-structured interview data for a developmental formative evaluation of a cardiovascular disease prevention intervention. Over 18 weeks, we conducted and analyzed 35 semi-structured interviews that were conducted with patients and health care providers in the Veterans Health Administration to identify targets for adapting the intervention in preparation for a clinical trial. We identified 12 key themes describing actionable targets for intervention modification. We highlight important methodological decisions that allowed us to maintain rigor when using qualitative rapid analysis for intervention adaptation and we provide practical guidance on the resources needed to execute similar qualitative studies. We additionally reflect on the benefits and challenges of the described approach when working within a remote research team environment. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04545489.

show abstract