Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework

Abstract

Background Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles. Results Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients’ intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health. Conclusion It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems. Protocol registration The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.

Digitalization in the Emergency Department—An Interview Study of Nurses’ Experiences in Norway

“…According to the World Health Organization [36] digital innovation is happening at an unprecedented scale-not only in Eds-hereby harnessing the power of such technologies and health innovation to accelerate global attainment of health and wellbeing [36]. However, it seems like there is a need to increase ED nurses' knowledge about the effectiveness of such tools to achieve more positive attitudes and, therefore, acceptance [9][10][11][12]. Digital literacy has been defined as "the ability to access, manage, understand, integrate, communicate, evaluate and create information safely and appropriately through digital technologies for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship" [37].…”

“…Studies show that healthcare personnel's knowledge impacts whether digital technology is adopted or not [9,10]. Also, their attitudes are important aspects in the acceptance and implementation of new technologies [11,12]. A study of urgent care clinicians' perceptions of digital access to patients' past medical history in the ED found that clinicians had a high level of technology acceptance, even if they also had several areas that needed improvement [13].…”

Digital transformation in healthcare: Have we gone off the rails?

“…The main reasons include performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions, which act as significant determinants to users' behavioral intention. Others have drawn on regulatory, compliance, and legal challenges that the digital health revolution is creating for the healthcare sector: 7 the skepticism about the effectiveness of the technology 8 and the quality of the services provided and the vulnerability of technology to risks such as cyberattacks 9 to report a few. Not surprisingly, often decidedly nontechnological barriers are identified as major barriers to digital transformation.…”

From the mathematical model to the patient: The scientific and human aspects of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery

“…The progressive computerization of our clinical records and the introduction of novel technology in the assistance of our patients, for example, are tangible realities. Although these changes in our clinical practice can undoubtedly be beneficial, they often constitute a challenge and require further research to optimize them[ 1 ].…”