2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12167-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among male sex workers in Mexico: an application of the RE-AIM framework

Abstract: Background The ImPrEP México demonstration project is the first to distribute free HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women living in Mexico. In Mexico City, MSM who are also male sex workers (MSWs) face a disproportionately high risk of HIV infection. PrEP is highly effective for HIV prevention, yet “real-life” implementation among MSWs is a challenge due to the unique adherence barriers faced by this population. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the study period, 19% of negative tests among FSW and 55% among AGYW resulted in initiation. Some possible explanations, as provided anecdotally by those delivering PrEP, for the lower levels of initiation seen among FSW include: FSW have been using condoms as a trusted prevention method and may not see the need to change or supplement this and FSW experience unstable housing, which may challenge daily pill-taking [25]. Additionally, because women can test multiple times each year (FSW are recommended to test quarterly) and because it includes those who are already on PrEP, the denominator overestimates the number eligible, and the proportion initiating in a given month is likely an underestimate of the proportion who ever initiated PrEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the study period, 19% of negative tests among FSW and 55% among AGYW resulted in initiation. Some possible explanations, as provided anecdotally by those delivering PrEP, for the lower levels of initiation seen among FSW include: FSW have been using condoms as a trusted prevention method and may not see the need to change or supplement this and FSW experience unstable housing, which may challenge daily pill-taking [25]. Additionally, because women can test multiple times each year (FSW are recommended to test quarterly) and because it includes those who are already on PrEP, the denominator overestimates the number eligible, and the proportion initiating in a given month is likely an underestimate of the proportion who ever initiated PrEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long-acting bimonthly provider-administered injection versus a pill taken daily or during times of risk). Programs implementing oral PrEP have noted challenges with uptake and effective use among oral PrEP users [10][11][12][13][14]. Furthermore, strong preferences for long-acting prevention products among certain populations, such as adolescent girls and young women, have been reported [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PrEP interventions are complex and their implementation associated with a range of barriers at different levels. 12 15 Finding ways of supporting retention in care could potentially strengthen the impact of PrEP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%