2020
DOI: 10.1111/cch.12752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and facilitators to obesity prevention dissemination and implementation efforts in the childcare centre setting from the provider perspective

Abstract: Background It has been established that the childcare centre (CCC) is a setting suitable for healthy weight promotion efforts. As the field advances, it is important to understand the barriers and facilitators to early childhood obesity prevention implementation and dissemination efforts from the CCC providers' perspective. This is especially true among those who serve low‐income and diverse populations to maximize scalability success. Methods Focus groups were held in English or Spanish with CCC providers acr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, centers were already promoting physical activity and healthful eating in some form; therefore, many viewed the EBI as compatible with existing practices and could reinforce what they were already doing. Compatibility has been recognized as a facilitator to program adoption based on previous studies of physical activity and nutrition interventions delivered in childcare settings (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). For example, EBIs that "fit well within existing curricula"), "enhanced the classroom, " or were aligned with existing "preschool and government health objectives" were considered facilitators to implementation (23, 24, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most cases, centers were already promoting physical activity and healthful eating in some form; therefore, many viewed the EBI as compatible with existing practices and could reinforce what they were already doing. Compatibility has been recognized as a facilitator to program adoption based on previous studies of physical activity and nutrition interventions delivered in childcare settings (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). For example, EBIs that "fit well within existing curricula"), "enhanced the classroom, " or were aligned with existing "preschool and government health objectives" were considered facilitators to implementation (23, 24, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar adaptations have been identified in previous studies. These studies included settings with predominantly white populations (e.g., Sweden and Scotland); however, the income status of families with children enrolled in the centers was not reported (23,27,31,32) as is often the case in many of these studies. The theme of adaptability was also found in studies conducted in Head Start centers which serve low-income families (26, 33, 34), which is more similar to the target population in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, studies had fictional characters as fruits and vegetables for its stories, but the characters used in the intervention with positive effects, were preschool-aged children and animals. Information and communication technologies vs. traditional approaches targeting parents to improve healthy diet or body mass index in preschoolers: a systematic review been previously described as a barrier to obesity prevention in childcare settings instead of being a facilitator, because some parents did nothing for their children to eat healthier when only received information 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus there is a need to strengthen the limited evidence available on parents' experience of ‘being involved’ ‘participating’ or ‘engaged’ in their child's food and nutrition in EYS, or of their perception of their roles and responsibility in this ( Briley et al., 1999 ; Lloyd-Williams et al., 2011 ; Moore et al., 2005 ). Existing studies report that barriers and tensions exist on both sides, with parents feeling patronized by EYS staff ‘educating’ them, or viewing EYS staff as ‘too busy’ to engage in conversations on food; and EYS staff being unsure of how to communicate about good nutrition without offending parents, and viewing parents as an obstacle to healthy eating by continuing to supply their child with unhealthy snacks and food options ( Dev et al., 2017 ; Drake, 1991 ; Lebron et al., 2020 ; McSweeney et al., 2016 ; Moore et al., 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%