Abstract:Background
Dental diseases are prevalent among asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs). Despite significant treatment needs, access to dental care in host countries is often limited. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the barriers and enablers to dental care access for ASRs in host countries of very high development.
Methods
Five health and social care databases and eight grey literature sources of information were searched. The Critical … Show more
“…Through the results of this study, nationality and the origin of the patient seemed to play a signi cant role in the oral health status, as patients from Afghanistan and Syria seemed to have signi cantly higher DMFT average value compared to other nationalities, the explanation of this result need further investigation and data collection as many factors can determine the oral health status like socioeconomic status, the trends and tradition regarding oral health hygiene, and the length of the route taken to reach Europe (8, 15, 25, 28), the result of our study agrees with another research which found signi cant difference in oral health between refugees from middle east compared to refugees from Africa, as refugees from middle east had worse oral health status (29), and the previous research explained this result because of the different diet as the African diet is low in fat and sugar, and the habit of brushing teeth, for example, tooth-brushing was a daily habits for all African participants in the previous study (29,30).…”
Introduction: Providing dental treatment in humanitarian context has always been a challenge, as dental treatment requires a lot of tools and expensive equipment, and most of the treatment takes long time and effort to finish. This research aims to study the oral health status and the need for dental treatments among the refugees' residents in Karatepe refugee camps in Lesvos Island, Greece. And to study the relation of oral health with different demographic variable and the duration of stay inside the camp.Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional study was conducted to study the oral health status among the refugees, data was collected from the patients after obtaining informed consent to participate in the research. Data regarding demographic variables, oral health (DMFT index), medical history, and the time spend in the camp have been collected. Data was collected between May-September 2021, and the final sample size was 996 patients. SPSS V.22 was used to analyze the data using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Age ranged between 2-73, and was on average 28 years, males were (61.1%), females (38.9%), and the majority of the sample were from Afghanistan (64.9%) and Syria (22.8%). Most of the reugees spent 1-2 years inside the camp (34%). The main complaint of the patients was pain (34.2%), and the main treatment provided was extraction (32.7%). Significant difference was found between age (0.032), nationality (0.002), medical history (0.001), and the time spend in the camp (0.021), however, gender didn't show significant difference (0.072). Conclusion: More attention should be given to oral health as the main complaint of the patients was pain, however, the lack of access to dental services inside the camp makes it hard to save the teeth and makes extraction the only possible solution.
“…Through the results of this study, nationality and the origin of the patient seemed to play a signi cant role in the oral health status, as patients from Afghanistan and Syria seemed to have signi cantly higher DMFT average value compared to other nationalities, the explanation of this result need further investigation and data collection as many factors can determine the oral health status like socioeconomic status, the trends and tradition regarding oral health hygiene, and the length of the route taken to reach Europe (8, 15, 25, 28), the result of our study agrees with another research which found signi cant difference in oral health between refugees from middle east compared to refugees from Africa, as refugees from middle east had worse oral health status (29), and the previous research explained this result because of the different diet as the African diet is low in fat and sugar, and the habit of brushing teeth, for example, tooth-brushing was a daily habits for all African participants in the previous study (29,30).…”
Introduction: Providing dental treatment in humanitarian context has always been a challenge, as dental treatment requires a lot of tools and expensive equipment, and most of the treatment takes long time and effort to finish. This research aims to study the oral health status and the need for dental treatments among the refugees' residents in Karatepe refugee camps in Lesvos Island, Greece. And to study the relation of oral health with different demographic variable and the duration of stay inside the camp.Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional study was conducted to study the oral health status among the refugees, data was collected from the patients after obtaining informed consent to participate in the research. Data regarding demographic variables, oral health (DMFT index), medical history, and the time spend in the camp have been collected. Data was collected between May-September 2021, and the final sample size was 996 patients. SPSS V.22 was used to analyze the data using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Age ranged between 2-73, and was on average 28 years, males were (61.1%), females (38.9%), and the majority of the sample were from Afghanistan (64.9%) and Syria (22.8%). Most of the reugees spent 1-2 years inside the camp (34%). The main complaint of the patients was pain (34.2%), and the main treatment provided was extraction (32.7%). Significant difference was found between age (0.032), nationality (0.002), medical history (0.001), and the time spend in the camp (0.021), however, gender didn't show significant difference (0.072). Conclusion: More attention should be given to oral health as the main complaint of the patients was pain, however, the lack of access to dental services inside the camp makes it hard to save the teeth and makes extraction the only possible solution.
“…Through the results of this study, nationality and the origin of the patient seemed to play a signi cant role in the oral health status, as patients from Afghanistan and Syria seemed to have signi cantly higher DMFT average value compared to other nationalities, the explanation of this result need further investigation and data collection as many factors can determine the oral health status like socioeconomic status, the trends and tradition regarding oral health hygiene, and the length of the route taken to reach Europe (8,15,25,28), the result of our study agrees with another research which found signi cant difference in oral health between refugees from middle east compared to refugees from Africa, as refugees from middle east had worse oral health status (29), and the previous research explained this result because of the different diet as the African diet is low in fat and sugar, and the habit of brushing teeth, for example, tooth-brushing was a daily habits for all African participants in the previous study (29,30).…”
Section: Demographic Data and Sample Analysissupporting
Introduction: Providing dental treatment in humanitarian context has always been a challenge, as dental treatment requires a lot of tools and expensive equipment, and most of the treatment takes long time and effort to finish. This research aims to study the oral health status and the need for dental treatments among the refugees' residents in Karatepe refugee camps in Lesvos Island, Greece. And to study the relation of oral health with different demographic variable and the duration of stay inside the camp.Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional study was conducted to study the oral health status among the refugees, data was collected from the patients after obtaining informed consent to participate in the research. Data regarding demographic variables, oral health (DMFT index), medical history, and the time spend in the camp have been collected. Data was collected between May-September 2021, and the final sample size was 996 patients. SPSS V.22 was used to analyze the data using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Age ranged between 2-73, and was on average 28 years, males were (61.1%), females (38.9%), and the majority of the sample were from Afghanistan (64.9%) and Syria (22.8%). Most of the reugees spent 1-2 years inside the camp (34%). The main complaint of the patients was pain (34.2%), and the main treatment provided was extraction (32.7%). Significant difference was found between age (0.032), nationality (0.002), medical history (0.001), and the time spend in the camp (0.021), however, gender didn't show significant difference (0.072). Conclusion: More attention should be given to oral health as the main complaint of the patients was pain, however, the lack of access to dental services inside the camp makes it hard to save the teeth and makes extraction the only possible solution.
“…As shown in Appendix 3, other key issues and challenges include transportation, an unfamiliar healthcare system, a lack of trust in the services and a limited understanding of how the system works, healthcare coverage and cost, time pressures associated with visiting healthcare centres, a lack of social support, employment obligations, and no continuity of care. Anxiety relating to medical treatment and particular health beliefs can also become problematic (Paisi et al, 2020). Furthermore, healthcare service frameworks for "good practice" are important to improve refugee access, equity and the quality of care as well as planning and evaluating services (Feldman, 2006).…”
Section: Theme 1: Refugee Access and Adaptation To Healthcare Service...mentioning
Purpose
This study aims to systematically review and conceptualise service-related research on refugees to identify gaps in the literature, derive future research avenues and stimulate interdisciplinary research and practice to improve well-being of refugees.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) of 102 journal articles published or available online from 2000 to 2020.
Findings
Ten themes are identified across the three phases of the refugees’ service journey (entry, transition and exit). Most of the articles focus on the exit phase. One-third of the literature analyses refugees’ access and adaptation to health-care services. The dearth of research on other refugee services reflects the failure to attend to all aspects of service provision across all phases of the refugee service journey.
Research limitations/implications
While the ten themes across the three phases require scholars’ and practitioners’ attention, different aspects of the SLR’s findings necessitate further investigation. To reinvigorate research and practice, and stimulate interdisciplinary collaboration, a novel Communities of Practice approach is suggested.
Practical implications
Practitioners and policymakers should place more focus on the entry and transition phases of the refugee service journey.
Social implications
Lack of research and engagement with the first two phases of the refugee journey might come at the expense of refugees. More service support is needed to buffer the journey from homeland to host country.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this SLR on refugee-related services is the first of its kind from a service research perspective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.