2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-018-0794-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and Facilitators to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Immigrants in the United States

Abstract: To summarize the literature on barriers and facilitators to breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrants to the US. A literature review was conducted for studies on breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrant populations. A thematic analysis of 180 studies identified a variety of barriers and facilitators to screening at the personal and system levels. Personal barriers included lack of knowledge and insurance coverage, high cost of care, and immigration status. System barriers included poor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
68
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
11
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous literatures, cultural beliefs have been identified as a significant barrier (cancer as sin, the result of immorality) in women to undergo cancer screening as they prominently influence the level of understanding and knowledge about these cancers (de Cuevas et al, 2018;Gupta et al, 2015;Lee, 2015;Meana et al, 2001;Modibbo et al, 2016;Szalacha et al, 2017) and interventions addressing them have also produced results (Adunlin et al, 2019;Pratt et al, 2019). Financial concern was reported both in the current study and previous studies (Malhotra et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In previous literatures, cultural beliefs have been identified as a significant barrier (cancer as sin, the result of immorality) in women to undergo cancer screening as they prominently influence the level of understanding and knowledge about these cancers (de Cuevas et al, 2018;Gupta et al, 2015;Lee, 2015;Meana et al, 2001;Modibbo et al, 2016;Szalacha et al, 2017) and interventions addressing them have also produced results (Adunlin et al, 2019;Pratt et al, 2019). Financial concern was reported both in the current study and previous studies (Malhotra et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous studies examining factors affecting cervical cancer screening have been conducted in select populations, mainly immigrants and uninsured women in the United States. 30,31 This study provides data on a general population of cervical cancer survivors in three states that could be used to guide interventions to increase cervical cancer screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The concept of training non-medical professionals to assist in the screening of breast cancer is not a new one, 22 and the use of CHWs has helped to improve acceptability and increase uptake among minority and underserved groups of women in HICs such as the USA. [23][24][25] Furthermore, although CHWs have been successfully trained and deployed to help reduce the burden of maternal and child health challenges, as well as infectious and other non-communicable diseases, their role to assist in breast cancer screening in LMICs is less clear. We identified only one systematic review by Wadler et al 26 in 2011, which assessed the role of CHWs in South Africa to improve breast cancer control, 26 and are unaware of any other reviews assessing the role of CHWs across LMICs more broadly.…”
Section: Bmj Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%