Barriers and facilitators for implementation of a complex health services intervention in long-term care homes: a qualitative study using focus groups

Abstract

Background With rising numbers of elderly people living in nursing homes in Germany, the need for on-site primary care is increasing. A lack of primary care in nursing homes can lead to unnecessary hospitalization, higher mortality, and morbidity in the elderly. The project CoCare (“coordinated medical care”) has therefore implemented a complex health intervention in nursing homes, using inter alia, regular medical rounds, a shared patient medical record and medication checks, with the aim of improving the coordination of medical care. This study reports upon the results of a qualitative study assessing the perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of CoCare by stakeholders. Methods Focus group interviews were held between October 2018 and November 2019 with nurses, general practitioners and GP’s assistants working or consulting in a participating nursing home. A semi-structured modular guideline was used to ask participants for their opinion on different aspects of CoCare and which barriers and facilitators they perceived. Focus groups were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results In total, N = 11 focus group interviews with N = 74 participants were conducted. We found six themes describing barriers and facilitators in respect of the implementation of CoCare: understaffing, bureaucracy, complexity, structural barriers, financial compensation, communication and collaboration. Furthermore, participants described the incorporation of the intervention into standard care. Conclusion Barriers perceived by stakeholders are well known in the literature (e.g. understaffing and complexity). However, CoCare provides a good structure to overcome barriers and some barriers will dissolve after implementation into routine care (e.g. bureaucracy). In contrast, especially communication and collaboration were perceived as facilitators in CoCare, with the project being received as a team building intervention itself. Trial registration WHO UTN: U1111–1196-6611; DRKS-ID: DRKS00012703 (Date of Registration in DRKS: 2017 Aug 23).

Barriers to providing internet-based home care services for urban older adults in China: a qualitative study of the service providers

“…Previous reports demonstrated that local governments set standardized implementation rules and quantifiable assessment indicators, and service providers gave priority to completing assessment tasks, resulting in service shortages [ 32 , 35 ]. In other countries, such as Germany and Poland, caregivers have a disproportionate amount of time allocated to organizing documents, completing complex bureaucratic procedures, and providing services [ 68 , 69 ]. In addition, Chen and Zheng found that service providers tend to change service items frequently to meet the preferences of purchasers and local officials, which makes it difficult to provide detailed, sustainable and in-depth services [ 70 ].…”

Prepared to Accompany the End of Life during Pandemics in Nursing Homes

“…Various studies highlighted the complexity of implementation processes in nursing homes, in and outside a pandemic situation [ 15 , 16 ]. Barriers and facilitators have also been described in the implementation of palliative care approaches in geriatric care [ 17 , 18 ].…”

Pflegeheim-sensitive Krankenhausfälle und Ansätze zur Verringerung der Hospitalisierung von Pflegeheimbewohnerinnen und -bewohnern

“…Eine erste Inventarisierung von Kooperationen zwischen Ärzteschaft und Pflegefachpersonal in Deutschland lieferte mögliche Ansatzpunkte für Verbesserungen [ 29 ]. Diese wurden in dem Projekt „CoCARE“ mittels regelmäßiger ärztlicher Visiten, einer gemeinsamen Patientenakte und Medikamentenkontrollen adressiert [ 30 ]. International empfiehlt die Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) für eine fokussierte Kommunikation zwischen ärztlich und pflegerisch tätigen Personen im Gesundheitswesen das „Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation“ (SBAR)-Tool 2 [ 48 – 50 ].…”