2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01207-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a quality improvement program for acute coronary syndromes in hospitals: a qualitative analysis using the consolidated framework for implementation research

Abstract: Background Ischemic heart disease causes a high disease burden globally and numerous challenges in treatment, particularly in developing countries such as China. The National Chest Pain Centers Program (NCPCP) was launched in China as the first nationwide, hospital-based, comprehensive, continuous quality improvement (QI) program to improve early diagnosis and standardized treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and improve patients’ clinical outcomes. With implementation and scaling up of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important collaboration process that can be challenging for community-based organizations was engaging and building buy-in among health professionals prior to the program delivery. Frequent staff change can hinder the process of engaging health professionals in the peer mentorship program ( 42 ). To address these barriers, community-based organizations can identify a local “champion”/“opinion leader” who can influence health professionals' attitudes and beliefs ( 43 , 44 ) Furthermore, program evaluation over time is deemed to be necessary for delivery sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important collaboration process that can be challenging for community-based organizations was engaging and building buy-in among health professionals prior to the program delivery. Frequent staff change can hinder the process of engaging health professionals in the peer mentorship program ( 42 ). To address these barriers, community-based organizations can identify a local “champion”/“opinion leader” who can influence health professionals' attitudes and beliefs ( 43 , 44 ) Furthermore, program evaluation over time is deemed to be necessary for delivery sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focused on compatibility between intervention features and capacities of delivery systems to learn and adapt (79,80), existing workflows and systems in the adopting organization (81,82), and implementer characteristics (83,84) (90)(91)(92)(93). Future research should focus on how to strengthen public sector health system leadership and coordination capacities as a precursor to extending the reach of PHC programs to the community-level (58,94).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview audio was transcribed verbatim and was analysed using thematic analysis. Two researchers independently analysed and coded the qualitative data into each domain of the consolidated framework for implementation research 40 using NVivo V.12.0 (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia) and reached a consensus on coding through regular discussion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%