Barriers and enablers for participation in healthy lifestyle programs by adolescents who are overweight: a qualitative study of the opinions of adolescents, their parents and community stakeholders

Abstract

BackgroundOverweight or obesity during adolescence affects almost 25% of Australian youth, yet limited research exists regarding recruitment and engagement of adolescents in weight-management or healthy lifestyle interventions, or best-practice for encouraging long-term healthy behaviour change. A sound understanding of community perceptions, including views from adolescents, parents and community stakeholders, regarding barriers and enablers to entering and engaging meaningfully in an intervention is critical to improve the design of such programs.MethodsThis paper reports findings from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted with adolescents (n?=?44), parents (n?=?12) and community stakeholders (n?=?39) in Western Australia. Three major topics were discussed to inform the design of more feasible and effective interventions: recruitment, retention in the program and maintenance of healthy change. Data were analysed using content and thematic analyses.ResultsData were categorised into barriers and enablers across the three main topics. For recruitment, identified barriers included: the stigma associated with overweight, difficulty defining overweight, a lack of current health services and broader social barriers. The enablers for recruitment included: strategic marketing, a positive approach and subsidising program costs. For retention, identified barriers included: location, timing, high level of commitment needed and social barriers. Enablers for retention included: making it fun and enjoyable for adolescents, involving the family, having an on-line component, recruiting good staff and making it easy for parents to attend. For maintenance, identified barriers included: the high degree of difficulty in sustaining change and limited services to support change. Enablers for maintenance included: on-going follow up, focusing on positive change, utilisation of electronic media and transition back to community services.ConclusionsThis study highlights significant barriers for adolescents and parents to overcome to engage meaningfully with weight-management or healthy lifestyle programs. A number of enablers were identified to promote ongoing involvement with an intervention. This insight into specific contextual opinions from the local community can be used to inform the delivery of healthy lifestyle programs for overweight adolescents, with a focus on maximising acceptability and feasibility.

It’s A-bout Time: Detailed Patterns of Physical Activity in Obese Adolescents Participating in a Lifestyle Intervention

“…6 CAFAP was developed based on Self-Determination Theory and Goal Setting Theory through formative assessment with stakeholders. 25,26 The program was delivered in the community by a multidisciplinary team of a dietitian, physiotherapist/exercise scientist, and psychologist. Participants and parents attended sessions twice per week for eight weeks.…”

Predictors of Retention Among African Americans in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Healthy Eating and Active Living in the Spirit (HEALS) Intervention

“…17,32 One reason why obese participants may be less likely to be retained is because of the stigma associated with being overweight and obese, especially within trials that include diet and physical activity behavior change. 33 One study also suggested that weight loss within the first two weeks of studies predicted retention. 19 While weight loss was a.…”

Diet and physical activity environments in primary schools in Brunei Darussalam

“…worldwide were found to be overweight or obese, a quarter of whom were in the obese category (Lobstein et al, 2004;Smith, Straker, McManus, & Fenner, 2014). Childhood obesity, regardless of a country's socio-economic status and its place on the developed, developing, low-income and high-income scale, has been shown to be increasing very rapidly (Lasserre, Chiolero, Paccaud, & Bovet, 2007;Lobstein, 2015;Wang & Lobstein, 2006).…”

“…Another important issue to be considered is that, currently, there is no globally standardised method of classifying overweight and obesity, which may have impact on global monitoring (Khambalia, Dickinson, Hardy, Gill, & Baur, 2012). However, IOTF and WHO standards have been used since the 1990s in many parts of the world (Smith et al, 2014;World Health Organization, 2016a). IOTF has also recently updated their classifications based on the information on their website (Smith et al, 2014).…”

“…However, IOTF and WHO standards have been used since the 1990s in many parts of the world (Smith et al, 2014;World Health Organization, 2016a). IOTF has also recently updated their classifications based on the information on their website (Smith et al, 2014). Studies in other countries such as Taiwan and…”