2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study

Abstract: The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scepticism may, among other things, be related to the lack of multicentered trials to validate the AI software [9][10][11][12][13]. Secondly, there are a number of potential ethical issues regarding responsibility, reliability, and transparency attached to the AI implementation [14][15][16][17]. A third cause is derived from the professional experiencing ambiguity or mistrust in relation to the managerial justifications for buying and implementing AI-products, often associated with a lack of communication or potential conflicts of interest [6,18,19].…”
Section: Thematic Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scepticism may, among other things, be related to the lack of multicentered trials to validate the AI software [9][10][11][12][13]. Secondly, there are a number of potential ethical issues regarding responsibility, reliability, and transparency attached to the AI implementation [14][15][16][17]. A third cause is derived from the professional experiencing ambiguity or mistrust in relation to the managerial justifications for buying and implementing AI-products, often associated with a lack of communication or potential conflicts of interest [6,18,19].…”
Section: Thematic Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of "enablers" for AI clinical implementation in dental diagnostics are already known. The opinion leaders in the field will consider these aspects to foster a further implementation of AI in dentistry [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, decision‐makers must consider barriers associated with dependence on AI, accountability for clinical decisions, and associated ethical issues before widely implementing AI in dentistry (Muller et al.) 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%