Barriers and coping mechanisms to accessing healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional survey among patients with chronic diseases in rural Rwanda

Abstract

Background Large scale physical distancing measures and movement restrictions imposed to contain COVID-19, often referred to as ‘lockdowns’, abruptly and ubiquitously restricted access to routine healthcare services. This study describes reported barriers and coping mechanisms to accessing healthcare among chronic care patients during the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown in Rwanda. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among chronic care patients enrolled in pediatric development, HIV/AIDS, non-communicable diseases, mental health, and oncology programs at 3 rural Rwandan districts. Active patients with an appointment scheduled between March–June 2020 and a phone number recorded in the electronic medical record system were eligible. Data were collected by telephone interviews between 23rd April and 11th May 2020, with proxy reporting by caregivers for children and critically ill-patients. Fisher’s exact tests were used to measure associations. Logistic regression analysis was also used to assess factors associated with reporting at least one barrier to accessing healthcare during the lockdown. Results Of 220 patient respondents, 44% reported at least one barrier to accessing healthcare. Barriers included lack of access to emergency care (n = 50; 22.7%), lack of access to medication (n = 44; 20.0%) and skipping clinical appointments (n = 37; 16.8%). Experiencing barriers was associated with the clinical program (p < 0.001), with oncology patients being highly affected (64.5%), and with increasing distance from home to the health facility (p = 0.031). In the adjusted logistic regression model, reporting at least one barrier to accessing healthcare was associated with the patient's clinical program and district of residence. Forty (18.2%) patients identified positive coping mechanisms to ensure continuation of care, such as walking long distances during suspension of public transport (n = 21; 9.6%), contacting clinicians via telephone for guidance or rescheduling appointments (n = 15; 6.8%), and delegating someone else for medication pick-up (n = 6; 2.7%). Of 124 patients who reported no barriers to accessing healthcare, 9% used positive coping mechanisms. Conclusion A large proportion of chronic care patients experienced barriers to accessing healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown. However, many patients also independently identified positive coping mechanisms to ensure continuation of care - strategies that could be formally adopted by healthcare systems in Rwanda and similar settings to mitigate effects of future lockdowns on patients.

Access to Mental Health Care during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Results from the COMET Multicentric Study

“…Not surprisingly, people using adaptive coping strategies were more likely to access mental health services during the lockdown [ 118 , 119 ]. However, it could be that people receiving adequate professional support are more likely to develop adaptive coping strategies [ 47 ].…”

Experience of Healthcare Access in Australia during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…When people fail to access the care they need, the impact can be seen in an increase in both direct mortality (from the disease itself) and indirect mortality (from preventable and treatable conditions) [18][19][20][21]. Such consequences can either be exacerbated or mitigated through individual patient and health service responses [22]. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers adopted a variety of strategies, including telehealth and home delivery for medicines, to promote continuation of care and reduce the risk of exposing patients to infections.…”

Impact of the COVID‐19 national lockdown in the allergic rhinitis symptoms in patients treated with immunotherapy at two allergy referral centers in Bogotá, Colombia

“…3 Efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 included isolation, movement restrictions, and national lockdowns, defined as large-scale physical distancing measures. 4 In Colombia, the first COVID-19 national lockdown was established between March and May 2020. Although lockdown restrictions were necessary to fight the pandemic, statistical models suggest that these restrictive measures mainly impacted patients with chronic diseases in low-and middle-income countries.…”

“…Latin America is one of the regions with the highest rates of cases and mortality from coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) 3 . Efforts to contain the spread of COVID‐19 included isolation, movement restrictions, and national lockdowns, defined as large‐scale physical distancing measures 4 . In Colombia, the first COVID‐19 national lockdown was established between March and May 2020.…”