2018
DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v16i2.20300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barrett’s Esophagus in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Abstract: Background: Barrett’s esophagus a is metaplasia of normal squamous cells that line the lower part of the esophagus and carries a major risk for adenocarcinoma of esophagus. In Asian population, the prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma are less common than in Western countries but has been increasing.Methods: This is a hospital based descriptive study comprising of 120 consecutive patients with symptoms of gastroesophagial reflux disease belonging to both sexes of any age group. The diagnosis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients underwent gastroscopies at the 3-and 6-month post-surgical follow-up. The Los Angeles classification was used to assess the degree of esophageal mucosal damage (20). Grade A damage is defined as one or more region of the mucosa damaged in the esophageal mucosa, with a length less than 5 mm.…”
Section: The Degree Of Esophageal Mucosal Injury Before and After Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients underwent gastroscopies at the 3-and 6-month post-surgical follow-up. The Los Angeles classification was used to assess the degree of esophageal mucosal damage (20). Grade A damage is defined as one or more region of the mucosa damaged in the esophageal mucosa, with a length less than 5 mm.…”
Section: The Degree Of Esophageal Mucosal Injury Before and After Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGD is the most important diagnostic tool for confirming the diagnosis of GERD. The identification of Barrett's esophagus, mucosal breaks such as esophagitis, hiatal hernia, and biopsies to rule out of malignancy are allowed by EGD [59606162636465].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Даний метод має безперечну перевагу, що полягає в безпосередній оцінці ступеня ураження, а також можливості контролю лікування. Проте використання гістологічного дослідження має і певні труднощі в застосуванні, а самевисока вартість обстеження та відсутність спеціального обладнання [25]. Застосування інвазивних методів має небезпеку травматизації слизової оболонки стравоходу та ризик інфікування Helicobacter pylori.…”
unclassified