2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baroreceptor activation attenuates attentional effects on pain-evoked potentials

Abstract: Focused attention typically enhances neural nociceptive responses, reflected electroencephalographically as increased amplitude of pain-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs). Additionally, pain-evoked ERPs are attenuated by hypertension and baroreceptor activity, through as yet unclear mechanisms. There is indirect evidence that these two effects may interact, suggesting that baroreceptor-related modulation of nociception is more than a low-level gating phenomenon. To address this hypothesis, we explored in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(39 reference statements)
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, as observed previously in smaller animal models, the present data provide evidence of measurable but reflex-specific baroreceptor gating of somatosensory inputs in humans. As such, these observations add to previous observations with respect to the interactions of baroreflex inputs on nociception and small-diameter type III and type IV somatosensory afferents (Edwards et al 2008;Gray et al 2010;Potts et al 2003;Quest and Gebber 1972).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, as observed previously in smaller animal models, the present data provide evidence of measurable but reflex-specific baroreceptor gating of somatosensory inputs in humans. As such, these observations add to previous observations with respect to the interactions of baroreflex inputs on nociception and small-diameter type III and type IV somatosensory afferents (Edwards et al 2008;Gray et al 2010;Potts et al 2003;Quest and Gebber 1972).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, Gray and colleagues (2009) have demonstrated an involvement of the insula, amygdala, and brain stem nuclei in the integration of somatosensory stimuli presented either before or during early cardiac systole in humans, showing that baroreceptor activity across the cardiac cycle influences the cortical processing of somatosensory stimuli (Gray et al 2009). The concept of baroreceptor modulation also extends to the gating of other sensory responses including nociception (Edwards et al 2008;Gray et al 2010). Thus, we sought to examine the sympathetic response and cortical representation of baroreflex gating of somatosensory afferent inputs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is less clear-cut in the case of cutaneous stimuli: sensitivity to cutaneous stimuli either at threshold for perception [75] or around pain threshold [76] was found to increase when the stimulus was presented about 300 ms after the R peak of the ECG. However, cardiac phase had no effect on pain ratings of nociceptive cutaneous stimuli above pain threshold [77].…”
Section: (B) Modulation Of Behavioural Performance Throughout the Carmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Resting SBP has been convincingly linked to experimental pain manipulation, but the relationship with DBP is less consistent, with several adult studies finding no relation regardless of the pain task (Bruehl, Carlson, & McCubbin, ; Guasti, Zanotti et al., ; Helfer & McCubbin, ; Myers et al., ; Page & France, ). Relatedly, an emerging literature has used PRES to consider how timing and duration of baroreceptor activity during cardiac systole leads to changes in the neural signatures of pain processing (Gray et al., ). One key finding to explain how stable resting BP is linked to diminished pain sensitivity, in light of the mechanisms of baroreceptor resetting following prolonged blood pressure elevations, is the degree of phasic , rather than tonic, stimulation in relation to the cardiac cycle (Bruehl & Chung, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%