Barometric Pressure and Triaxial Accelerometry-Based Falls Event Detection

Abstract

Falls and fall related injuries are a significant cause of morbidity, disability, and health care utilization, particularly among the age group of 65 years and over. The ability to detect falls events in an unsupervised manner would lead to improved prognoses for falls victims. Several wearable accelerometry and gyroscope-based falls detection devices have been described in the literature; however, they all suffer from unacceptable false positive rates. This paper investigates the augmentation of such systems with a barometric pressure sensor, as a surrogate measure of altitude, to assist in discriminating real fall events from normal activities of daily living. The acceleration and air pressure data are recorded using a wearable device attached to the subject's waist and analyzed offline. The study incorporates several protocols including simulated falls onto a mattress and simulated activities of daily living, in a cohort of 20 young healthy volunteers (12 male and 8 female; age: 23.7 ±3.0 years). A heuristically trained decision tree classifier is used to label suspected falls. The proposed system demonstrated considerable improvements in comparison to an existing accelerometry-based technique; showing an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 96.9%, 97.5%, and 96.5%, respectively, in the indoor environment, with no false positives generated during extended testing during activities of daily living. This is compared to 85.3%, 75%, and 91.5% for the same measures, respectively, when using accelerometry alone. The increased specificity of this system may enhance the usage of falls detectors among the elderly population.

HeadsUp: Keeping Pedestrian Phone Addicts from Dangers Using Mobile Phone Sensors

“…To infer whether a user enters the vehicle from left side or right side of the vehicle or sits in front or rear seats [7] exploit the unique patterns mined from the rich dynamics in the accelerometer and magnetometer data observed during respective actions and make cognitive decision based on machine learning techniques. Some research works tend to protect elderly people from certain accidents [8][9][10][11][12], like accidental falls.…”

Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario

“…Although the thigh appears to be the position that yields the highest average accuracy in this experiment, users may sit with different positions of their legs in realistic scenarios. In many other related works [10,39,[59][60][61], a common suggestion is to place the sensor at the waist as this location is less affected by peripheral body motions than upper or lower limbs. In terms of usability, wearing a sensor at the waist is more comfortable compared to the thigh, particularly for elderlies.…”

What Does Big Data Mean for Wearable Sensor Systems?

“…There are numerous examples of situations during unsupervised monitoring using wearable sensors when raw signal data can be corrupted. Some notable mentions involve poor device affixation or failure to wear the sensor when recording inertial signals [15], and electrode movement or detachment during ECG recording [16]. Verifying the quality of data acquired during unsupervised monitoring is currently an active research area which employs both hardware and algorithmic solutions to ensure that poor quality data is identified and rejected [17][18][19].…”