1980
DOI: 10.1080/03091928008241178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baroclinic instability and geostrophic turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
224
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
224
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not contradict the well-known forward cascade of total baroclinic energy above the deformation scale (Charney 1971;Salmon 1998; also S. Danilov 2006, personal communication), because it turns out the forward potential energy cascade slightly overpowers the inverse kinetic energy (KE) cascade, leaving a small residual cascade of total energy converging toward the deformation scale. Because this baroclinic KE cascade dominates the surface layer cascade of the two-layer idealized quasigeostrophic (QG) model with surface-intensified stratification (thinner upper layer) used by SA07, it likely reflects the KE cascade observable with the altimeter data at least at scales larger than the deformation radius; at smaller scales, surface geostrophic turbulence effects become important (Lapeyre and Klein 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This does not contradict the well-known forward cascade of total baroclinic energy above the deformation scale (Charney 1971;Salmon 1998; also S. Danilov 2006, personal communication), because it turns out the forward potential energy cascade slightly overpowers the inverse kinetic energy (KE) cascade, leaving a small residual cascade of total energy converging toward the deformation scale. Because this baroclinic KE cascade dominates the surface layer cascade of the two-layer idealized quasigeostrophic (QG) model with surface-intensified stratification (thinner upper layer) used by SA07, it likely reflects the KE cascade observable with the altimeter data at least at scales larger than the deformation radius; at smaller scales, surface geostrophic turbulence effects become important (Lapeyre and Klein 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A rich phenomenology has developed (Danilov and Gurarie 2000;Vallis 2006), with key features being a robust inverse cascade transferring total (kinetic plus potential) energy toward the deformation scale and toward lower baroclinic modes. The energy, after finally reaching the barotropic mode, is ultimately transferred toward larger scales via the classic barotropic inverse kinetic energy cascade (Charney 1971;Fu and Flierl 1980;Salmon 1980;Hua and Haidvogel 1986;Larichev and Held 1995;Salmon 1998;Smith and Vallis 2001). On a spherical planet the (meridional) planetary potential vorticity gradient ␤ may dominate, which tends to redirect the barotropic inverse cascade more into larger-scale zonally oriented flow at the expense of meridionally oriented flow (Rhines 1977;Vallis and Maltrud 1993;Galperin et al 2004;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his baroclinic adjustment theory, based on the two-layer quasi-geostrophic model (Phillips 1951), a rotating, stratified fluid may adjust the mean thermal structure to maintain a stably-stratified environment that is close to a marginally critical state for baroclinic instability (Stone 1978) with a criticality parameter,ξ, that equilibrates to ξ ≈ 1. ξ is a measure of the isentropic slope and defined as (Zurita-Gotor and Vallis 2010), with θ the mean potential temperature, f ≡ 2� sin φ (where φ is latitude) and β quantifies the (linearised) dependence of the coriolis force on latitude so that f ≃ f 0 + βy with f 0 a constant. Recent studies, however, have disputed this analysis, since numerical simulations have shown that the two-layer model does not necessarily equilibrate to a value of ξ ≈ 1 (e.g., Salmon 1978Salmon , 1980Vallis 1988). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dubovikov (2003, D3) and Canuto and Dubovikov (2005, CD5) argued that mesoscale eddy energy (EKE) does cascade upscale, a process that is now commonly recognized (Ferrari and Wunsch, 2009;Bruggemann and Eden, 2015;Jansen et al, 2015) and confirmed by sea surface height (SSH) data (Scott and Wang, 2005;Scott and Arbic, 2007). It is worth noticing that the mentioned energy cascade is rather different than that in the two-level geostrophic model (Salmon, 1978(Salmon, ,1980(Salmon, , 1998 within which at scales larger than the Rossby deformation radius d r there are the down-scale baroclinic energy cascade and the upscale barotropic one while at scales less than d r both cascades are directed down-scale. It is clear that such a flow contains no "conundrum".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%