2011
DOI: 10.5617/adno.1066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barns kommunikasjon med ulike typer kart - en progressiv tilnærming til kartlesing

Abstract: Barns kommunikasjon med ulike typer kart -en progressiv tilnaerming til kartlesing (Bjerva, Graesli, & Sigurjónsson, 2010) InnledningKartlesing kan oppfattes som en naturlig og ukomplisert aktivitet uten større krav enn normalt syn og gjennomsnittlig intelligens (Keates, 1996). Forestillingen er ganske interessant, med tanke på hvor mange år med formell utdanning som er viet andre primaere verktøy for kommunikasjon i vårt samfunn, for eksempel språk. Videre har bruk av naturen alltid stått sentralt i Norge, o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All ages and experience were included because studies have shown that even small children can use a map, while many adults are neither competent nor confident in using maps in the environment (Blades and Spencer, 1986; 1987; Gerber and Kwan, 1994; Vaagbø, 1997; Wiegand, 2006). Based on previous experience (Bjerva et al, 2011; Bjerva et al, 2008; Sigurjónsson, 2007), and the aim of summarising and comparing data, only those studies that had used maps and/or aerial photographs were included in the review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ages and experience were included because studies have shown that even small children can use a map, while many adults are neither competent nor confident in using maps in the environment (Blades and Spencer, 1986; 1987; Gerber and Kwan, 1994; Vaagbø, 1997; Wiegand, 2006). Based on previous experience (Bjerva et al, 2011; Bjerva et al, 2008; Sigurjónsson, 2007), and the aim of summarising and comparing data, only those studies that had used maps and/or aerial photographs were included in the review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%