2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barnase–Barstar: From first encounter to final complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(94 reference statements)
7
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a control of the protocol, US simulations were performed to study the association between Barnase and Barstar (Figure S6, Table 1 and Table S1). The observed PMF profile and ΔG PMF (−12.6 kcal mol −1 ) of the Barnase/Barstar complex are consistent with the high-affinity of the complex (K d ~136 fM) and previous MD studies (Hoefling & Gottschalk 2010; Wang et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a control of the protocol, US simulations were performed to study the association between Barnase and Barstar (Figure S6, Table 1 and Table S1). The observed PMF profile and ΔG PMF (−12.6 kcal mol −1 ) of the Barnase/Barstar complex are consistent with the high-affinity of the complex (K d ~136 fM) and previous MD studies (Hoefling & Gottschalk 2010; Wang et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, their simulations reveal that this protein-protein recognition process is mainly driven by the van der Waals and electrostatic interactions between two partner proteins. These results agree with the previous all-atom simulations 92 .…”
Section: Cg Models Of Proteinsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…55,69,70 The complex has been used here as a guide for model refinement. The other complexes considered are: trypsin bound to a protein inhibitor (2ptc) and histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr (1poh).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%