2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barnacle goose Branta leucopsis derogation shooting effort in relation to abundance and vulnerable crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Denmark, the populations of different water bird species vary. For example, the population size of barnacle geese in Denmark has increased five-fold in recent decades, while the size of the Danish mallard population is relatively stable ( 46 , 47 ). Bird migration flyways, wild bird densities, and bird movement are all suspected to play a role in AI transmission and should be considered when investigating the seasonality of AI detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Denmark, the populations of different water bird species vary. For example, the population size of barnacle geese in Denmark has increased five-fold in recent decades, while the size of the Danish mallard population is relatively stable ( 46 , 47 ). Bird migration flyways, wild bird densities, and bird movement are all suspected to play a role in AI transmission and should be considered when investigating the seasonality of AI detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should investigate the behavioural responses of tracked geese towards lethal repelling, a management tool which is used in other barnacle goose range countries (e.g. Denmark, Heldbjerg et al, 2022) and has only recently become permitted in Finland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate that repelling success and return time do not depend on the type of repelling measure. The sound of a gunshot, which the geese might associate with a serious threat as some of the individuals will have experienced lethal shooting, for example, during migration in Russia or in the non-breeding areas (Heldbjerg et al, 2022), did not cause the individuals to fly longer distances or to reduce their return probability compared with the human approach (Figure 2a,e,f). In crows, shooting was found to have a greater effect on the behaviour compared with non-lethal trapping, with increased flight initiation distances in areas with shooting (Fujioka, 2020).…”
Section: Differences Between Repelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the regional level, the County Administrative Boards (CABs) play an important role, e.g., by granting permission for derogation shooting (i.e. shooting of protected species or outside open hunting season for huntable species) 61 . Hunters are represented at all levels in the management system with local hunters needed as part of the implementation of flyway management of geese.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%