2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30849-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barn swallows long-distance migration occurs between significantly temperature-correlated areas

Abstract: Organisms are routinely confronted with crucial decisions on the best time and place to perform fundamental activities. However, unpredictable spatio-temporal variation in ecological factors makes life-history optimization difficult particularly for long-distance migrants, which are putatively blind of conditions thousands of kilometers and weeks ahead along their journey. Here we challenge, on a hierarchy of geographical scales, the common wisdom that migratory birds have no clue to ecological conditions at d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study illustrates the high potential for the start of migration to affect variation in arrival timing if the within-species effects quantified here correctly characterize within-individual effects. Since the anthropogenic changes in the climate and environment at wintering grounds are unlikely to coincide with the changes in breeding areas [133], but see also Pancerasa et al [134], it is not a phenotypic response alone but also an evolutionary shift in the start of spring migration that most likely explains the advanced breeding area arrival timing [6, 13]. Additionally, environmental conditions phenotypically affect the total speed of migration through an influence of varying feeding conditions at stopover sites on the total stopover duration [30, 77] and an influence of varying wind conditions on ground speed [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study illustrates the high potential for the start of migration to affect variation in arrival timing if the within-species effects quantified here correctly characterize within-individual effects. Since the anthropogenic changes in the climate and environment at wintering grounds are unlikely to coincide with the changes in breeding areas [133], but see also Pancerasa et al [134], it is not a phenotypic response alone but also an evolutionary shift in the start of spring migration that most likely explains the advanced breeding area arrival timing [6, 13]. Additionally, environmental conditions phenotypically affect the total speed of migration through an influence of varying feeding conditions at stopover sites on the total stopover duration [30, 77] and an influence of varying wind conditions on ground speed [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Swift differs from these hirundines in both foraging strategy (reaching higher altitudes) and nesting strategy (tending to nest in more urban areas), but all show distinct migratory strategies (e.g. Pancerasa et al 2018Pancerasa et al , Åkesson et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analyses, we included mean daily average temperatures and the mean Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values at all wintering sites for the months of January and February. Mean daily average temperatures across seasonal periods have been used to assess the effect of climatic variation and climate change on bird migration distances (Visser et al 2009), timing of arrival on breeding grounds (McKinney et al 2012), and a host of other phenological and chronological questions (Thackeray et al 2016, Pancerasa et al 2018. Seasonal PDSI values have been linked to the timing of nest initiation (Brown and Brown 2014) as well as habitat use (Igl and Johnson 1999).…”
Section: Wintering and Migration Weather Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%